2019
DOI: 10.1109/tthz.2019.2911033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission and Reflection Characterization of Polarizing Beam Splitters at Submillimeter Wavelengths

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of the transmission and reflection performance of different free-standing wire grids and photolithographic polarizers. This study has been carried out in the frame of the development work of the submillimeter-wave instrument (SWI) as part of the JUpiter and ICy moons Explorer mission of the European Space Agency. SWI is a passive heterodyne radiometer that is operating in the frequency bands from 530 to 625 GHz and from 1080 to 1275 GHz. The optical coupling network of SWI incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a wire grid using 10 μm wire at 35-μm spacing, Defrance 23 calculates at 1.4 THz a transmission of 99.8% at 0°and 99.7% at 45°, for the reflections the numbers are slightly lower at 99.1% and 98.3%, respectively. Jacob et al 24 obtained a good agreement between their calculations with measurements at 640 GHz, where transmission and reflections were above 99% for nearly all grids tested. For the HERO calculations, we used the most pessimistic number of 98.3%.…”
Section: Optical Lossesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…For a wire grid using 10 μm wire at 35-μm spacing, Defrance 23 calculates at 1.4 THz a transmission of 99.8% at 0°and 99.7% at 45°, for the reflections the numbers are slightly lower at 99.1% and 98.3%, respectively. Jacob et al 24 obtained a good agreement between their calculations with measurements at 640 GHz, where transmission and reflections were above 99% for nearly all grids tested. For the HERO calculations, we used the most pessimistic number of 98.3%.…”
Section: Optical Lossesmentioning
confidence: 72%