In the deregulated Norwegian electricity market a zonal transmission pricing system is used to cope with network capacity problems. In this paper we will illustrate some of the problems that the zonal pricing system, as implemented in Norway, has. With the use of small network examples we illustrate the difficulties involved in defining the zones, the redistribution effects of the surplus that a zonal pricing system has, as well as the conflicting interests concerning zone boundaries that are present among the various market participant. We also show that a zone allocation mechanism based on nodal prices does not necessarily lead to a zone system with maximal social surplus. Finally, we formulate an optimization model that when solved yields the zone system that maximizes social surplus given a pre-specification of the number of zones to be used.,QWURGXFWLRQA zonal approach to managing congestion has been adopted in the Norwegian scheduled power market. The trading process works approximately as follows:1) Based on the supply and demand schedule bids given by the market participants, the market is cleared while ignoring any grid limitations. This produces a system price S of energy.2) If the resulting flows induce capacity problems, the nodes of the grid are partitioned into zones.3) Considering the case with two zones defined, the zone with net supply is defined as the low-price area, whereas the net demand zone is determined the high-price area. 4) Net transmission over the zone-boundary is fixed when curtailed to meet the violated capacity limit.