KEY w o R D s. Cryoprotection, ultrastructure, freeze-fracture, microanalysis, glycerol, polymeric cryoprotectant, frozen sections.
S U M M A R YWith the ascendency of techniques for ultrarapid cooling and the successful control of ice crystal damage by purely physical means, it has become necessary to make a case for the continued use of chemical antifreeze agents in any circumstances. These circumstances include the need to explore tissues deeper than those superficial layers, whose morphology can be preserved by ultrarapid cooling, the avoidance of superficial areas of damage inflicted by dissection and tissue slicing, and situations where the growth of ice crystals must be controlled throughout the specimen, as for example for the cutting of frozen sections.The control of ice crystal damage would ideally be by the avoidance of any freezing at all but in practice can be seen in terms of the control of ice crystal size, which in turn depends on the density of nuclei that develop in the specimen and the rate of accretion of water molecules to the crystallites that form on these nuclei. Chemical antifreeze agents act in a variety of ways to increase the density of nuclei and/or to reduce the rate of growth of ice crystals: by promoting nucleation, by enhancing subcooling and by increasing the viscosity of the extracellular medium. In this way, large numbers of small ice crystals are produced. The different types of cryofixative agent each have their own advocates, advantages, special applications and drawbacks and these must be taken into account when considering the range of methods available for the analysis of cryofixed material.