1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(96)00530-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission electron microscopy studies of low-angle grain boundary interactions in melt-textured YBa2Cu3O7−x

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical composition variations near the GBs for the four crystals/bicrystals shown in figure 4 are analysed these very thin GBs are also very clean, consistent with the high-resolution TEM results reported by other groups [15]. The above-mentioned results clearly show that for thick GBs, the chemical composition deviates significantly from the stoichiometry of Y-123 with a deficiency of Y.…”
Section: Dopant Distribution Around Gbssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The chemical composition variations near the GBs for the four crystals/bicrystals shown in figure 4 are analysed these very thin GBs are also very clean, consistent with the high-resolution TEM results reported by other groups [15]. The above-mentioned results clearly show that for thick GBs, the chemical composition deviates significantly from the stoichiometry of Y-123 with a deficiency of Y.…”
Section: Dopant Distribution Around Gbssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…They are listed in table 1, along with the concentration and the mean diameter of the second phase, determined through the image analyses. The mean misorientation angles of the subgrains lie between 2.7 and 6.8 degrees, which is consistent with the results of the previous research for similar systems [3][4][5][6]. In the c-GS of YBCO, the misorientation increases in accordance with the growth, although it was not clearly observed by optical microscopy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus it is important to control the formation of subgrains for high-field applications along with the enlargement in the grain size of bulk materials. Several models for the subgrain formation have been proposed based on various microstructural observations by polarized optical microscopy and transmission electron microscopy [3][4][5][6]. Two major models for the subgrain formations are: the polygonization of the crystal after solidification through the stress relaxation [3]; and the rearrangement of dislocations created as a result of various instabilities during the solidification [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional factor which is likely to affect the coupling strength across LAGBs is GBD interactions when two or more sets of non-parallel dislocations accommodate the misorientation. As pointed out by Mironova et al [32] (see also Field et al [130] for further discussions) for GBs containing intersecting GBDs, the shape of the strongly coupled channels evolves to almost point-like contacts. Such considerations suggest that weak-link behaviour could be expected even in a low-angle regime for certain arbitrary GBs.…”
Section: Subgrain Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In such cases, the misorientation is accommodated by more than two sets of intersecting grain boundary dislocations (GBDs). Two sets of intersecting GBDs were identified in 4.01 • [0.50 0.86 0.05] [30] and 5.5 • [0.982 0.184 0.026] [24] GBs, and more than two sets have been identified in a 5.163 • [0.6702 −0.2414 0.2398] GB [31] and several GBs reported in [32]. For complex dislocation networks, the GB energy can frequently be lowered by dislocation interactions and reactions which in fact tend to increase the defect density and complexity of the GB microstructure.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Subgrain Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%