2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2007.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission expansion in Argentina 2: The Fourth Line revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Littlechild and Skerk [7] also re-examine the history and economics of the Fourth Line. They agree that the process reduced costs, so that the delay (which was short) was beneficial.…”
Section: The Fourth Linementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Littlechild and Skerk [7] also re-examine the history and economics of the Fourth Line. They agree that the process reduced costs, so that the delay (which was short) was beneficial.…”
Section: The Fourth Linementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Subsequent and more detailed research has shown that the Fourth Line was expensive, premature and uneconomic. (Littlechild and Skerk 2008b) Delaying its construction was evidence that the Public Contest method did work, not that it didn't work. In the short term, the participants agreed instead to expand capacity by installing capacitors, at a fraction of the cost of a new line.…”
Section: Coordination and Transactions Costs: Evidence From Argentinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1 E.g. Abdala (1994Abdala ( , 2007a, Abdala and Chambouleyron (1999), Abdala and Spiller (2000), Chisari et al (2001), Gómez-Ibáñez (2003), NERA (1998), Newbery (1999), Woolf (2003), as summarised in Littlechild and Skerk (2007b). 2 E.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%