Transmission Loss Allocation In The Deregulated Electricity Market Based On The Cooperative Game Theory

Abstract

Changing the structure of electrical energy markets from traditional to the restructured state, considering the loss allocation has been unavoidable. The importance of this matter is because the amount of loss consist significant part of total electrical energy. Loss in power system is a nonlinear function of power so using linear methods could not be efficient. On the other hand, applied function must consider both network characterizes and participation rate in power supplying and power consumption. The purpose of this paper is to present an applicable and modern solution based on the cooperative game theory for loss allocation of transmission lines in both pool and bilateral markets. This method has been tested on a 4 bus systems and a 14 bus IEEE.

A New Multi-objective Sorting Algorithm And Its Combination With Game Theory For Optimizing I-beam Engineering System

“…In the game theory, there are two types of games: the non-cooperative games and the cooperative games [5], [14], [15], [30], [31]. A basic understanding of those games is that, the number of design variables (N) are equal of number of objective functions (K).…”

Optimal cost allocation algorithm of transmission losses to bilateral contracts

“…Based on studies conducted by [21] have analyzed the complex power flows from the generator to the transmission network using the voltage superposition method. While the optimization method for transmission line loss using the direct method of economic dispatch studied by [22,23] has successfully solved the issues of optimal loss allocation from the transmission line.…”

Efficient algorithm for transmission system energy loss allocation considering multilateral contracts and load variation

“…Moreover, the losses are highly dependent on the incremental steps taken. This makes a loss allocation to be non‐unique [25]. (d) Circuit theory‐based techniques: These methods integrate the network characteristics and circuit theories into loss allocation [30–37].…”

“…Moreover, the losses are highly dependent on the incremental steps taken. This makes a loss allocation to be non‐unique [25].…”