2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.85.054306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission resonance spectroscopy in the third minimum of232Pa

Abstract: The fission probability of 232 Pa was measured as a function of the excitation energy in order to search for hyperdeformed (HD) transmission resonances using the (d, pf ) transfer reaction on a radioactive 231 Pa target. The experiment was performed at the Tandem accelerator of the MaierLeibnitz Laboratory (MLL) at Garching using the 231 Pa(d, pf ) reaction at a bombarding energy of E d =12 MeV and with an energy resolution of ∆E=5.5 keV. Two groups of transmission resonances have been observed at excitation e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Blons and collaborators [40] consistently find that the so called "third minima" of some light actinide nuclei are very shallow and no more than 0.5 MeV or so below the surrounding second and third barrier peaks, which are about 6 MeV above the ground-state minimum, in good agreement with results obtained in our current model [41]. In contrast, Csige and collaborators [42][43][44] find third minima for nuclei in this region that are up to 3 MeV below the surrounding peaks. We find it difficult to reconcile with potential-energy calculations the substantial difference in barrier structure they find between 232 92 U 140 [42] and 232 91 Pa 141 [43] in these studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 37%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example Blons and collaborators [40] consistently find that the so called "third minima" of some light actinide nuclei are very shallow and no more than 0.5 MeV or so below the surrounding second and third barrier peaks, which are about 6 MeV above the ground-state minimum, in good agreement with results obtained in our current model [41]. In contrast, Csige and collaborators [42][43][44] find third minima for nuclei in this region that are up to 3 MeV below the surrounding peaks. We find it difficult to reconcile with potential-energy calculations the substantial difference in barrier structure they find between 232 92 U 140 [42] and 232 91 Pa 141 [43] in these studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…In contrast, Csige and collaborators [42][43][44] find third minima for nuclei in this region that are up to 3 MeV below the surrounding peaks. We find it difficult to reconcile with potential-energy calculations the substantial difference in barrier structure they find between 232 92 U 140 [42] and 232 91 Pa 141 [43] in these studies. A change by just one proton and one neutron cannot, in potential-energy calculations, result in such large differences in barrier structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…axis ratio 3:1) third potential minimum remained unclear. In a series of measurements, employing light-particle induced direct reactions, in the isotopic chain of even-even uranium nuclei [13][14][15] (and recently in 232 Pa for the first time also in an odd-A isotope [16]), we succeeded to establish the existence of a deep third potential minimum, in some cases comparably deep as the second minimum. Since for hyperdeformed configurations the rather thin outer barrier results in fission lifetimes much shorter than typical lifetimes of collectively excited states in the excita- Energy (MeV) 00 00 00 11 11 11 00 00 00 11 11 11 000 000 000 111 111 111 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 000 000 000 111 111 111 000 000 000 111 111 111 000 000 000 111 111 111 00 00 00 11 11 11 00 00 00 11 11 11 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 000 000 000 111 111 111 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 00 00 00 11 11 11 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 000 000 000 111 111 111 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 00 00 00 11 11 11 00 00 00 11 11 11 00 00 00 00 11 11 11 11 000 000 000 000 111 111 111 111 00 00 00 11 11 11 00000 00000 11111 11111 00000 00000 00000 11111 11111 11111 00000 00000 11111 11111 Fig.…”
Section: The Multiple-humped Potential Barrier In the Actinidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though low-spin hyperdeformation has already proven to be a general feature of the light even-even actinides [3,4], no such systematics has been established for the odd-odd actinides. However, in a recent experiment [5], we found conclusive evidences on the existence of HD bands in an odd-odd nucleus ( 232 Pa) [5], which suggested to start a systematic investigation of the odd-odd actinides. 238 Np is a very interesting isotope regarding hyperdeformation: it is an isobar of 238 U, where a hyperdeformed third minimum has already been settled [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%