2015
DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2015.00095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmitter inputs to different motoneuron subgroups in the oculomotor and trochlear nucleus in monkey

Abstract: In all vertebrates the eyes are moved by six pairs of extraocular muscles enabling horizontal, vertical and rotatory movements. Recent work showed that each extraocular muscle is controlled by two motoneuronal groups: (1) Motoneurons of singly-innervated muscle fibers (SIF) that lie within the boundaries of motonuclei mediating a fast muscle contraction; and (2) motoneurons of multiply-innervated muscle fibers (MIF) in the periphery of motonuclei mediating a tonic muscle contraction. Currently only limited dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
6
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
4
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, slopes of horizontal and upward saccades, calculated as peak duration (amplitude/PV) vs. amplitude were not significantly associated with any of the clinical measures, perhaps because of both a ceiling level of horizontal saccades reflecting advanced disease and upward saccades being relatively spared by the disease process. The latter is probably caused by calretinin-positive input from premotor centers, interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC), riMLF, and y-group in upgaze, but not in downgaze pathways ( 19 21 ). Calretinin is a calcium-binding protein, and in combination with parvalbumin and perineuronal nets can help identify and analyze the upgaze vs. downgaze ocular motor disturbances in other lysosomal diseases, such as Niemann–Pick disease type C ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, slopes of horizontal and upward saccades, calculated as peak duration (amplitude/PV) vs. amplitude were not significantly associated with any of the clinical measures, perhaps because of both a ceiling level of horizontal saccades reflecting advanced disease and upward saccades being relatively spared by the disease process. The latter is probably caused by calretinin-positive input from premotor centers, interstitial nucleus of Cajal (INC), riMLF, and y-group in upgaze, but not in downgaze pathways ( 19 21 ). Calretinin is a calcium-binding protein, and in combination with parvalbumin and perineuronal nets can help identify and analyze the upgaze vs. downgaze ocular motor disturbances in other lysosomal diseases, such as Niemann–Pick disease type C ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calretinin does not serve as a suitable marker for INTs in primates, since our previous work revealed that in rhesus monkey calretinin-positive neurons are not present within the nVI proper (McCrea and Horn, 2006 ). Calretinin was rather found associated with premotor pathways targeting motoneurons involved in upgaze (Horn et al, 2003 ; Ahlfeld et al, 2011 ; Adamczyk et al, 2015 ; Zeeh et al, 2015 ). With 38% the size of the putative INT population within the nVI in human is larger compared to that found in rhesus monkey (26.4%), which may indicate a more elaborate system in human.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the histochemical properties of SIF- and MIF-motoneurons in and around the nIII in monkey the homologous cell groups were identified in human previously (Horn et al, 2008 ; Che Ngwa et al, 2014 ; Zeeh et al, 2015 ). Thereby, an updated topographical map of the oculomotor nucleus has been created (Che Ngwa et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In additional sections cholinergic neurons were detected by immunostaining for choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) as described previously [30]. To confirm the presence of GABAergic neurons in the Y-group, sections that had been immunostained with sheep anti-GAD [31] or mouse anti- [7]GABA [32] from previous studies were evaluated [33,34].…”
Section: Immunofluorescence Staining For Different Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%