2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2009.01168.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transnational Governance of Higher Education: On Globalization and International University Ranking Lists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This way of evaluating the qualities of higher education institutions is put forward by many actors over the world (see e.g., Hazelkorn, 2015) but is also questioned in several places. For instance, such ranking was criticized by the higher education organizations in Sweden (Lindblad & Foss Lindblad, 2009) and regarded as being of little importance to old universities with a strong research record, compared to less recognized higher education institutions, which regarded them as more influential (Sundén, 2012). It is also questioned in terms of societal relevance related to geopolitical termsfor instance when considering African higher education institutions and their tasks and contexts.…”
Section: University Ranking In a Global Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way of evaluating the qualities of higher education institutions is put forward by many actors over the world (see e.g., Hazelkorn, 2015) but is also questioned in several places. For instance, such ranking was criticized by the higher education organizations in Sweden (Lindblad & Foss Lindblad, 2009) and regarded as being of little importance to old universities with a strong research record, compared to less recognized higher education institutions, which regarded them as more influential (Sundén, 2012). It is also questioned in terms of societal relevance related to geopolitical termsfor instance when considering African higher education institutions and their tasks and contexts.…”
Section: University Ranking In a Global Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on Foucault, and using a case study concerning law schools, Sauder & Espeland (2009) argued that university rankings work as self-disciplinary processes of surveillance, normalization, and stratification, with wider impacts on our organizational culture and work experience. Lindblad & Lindblad (2009) also employed many Foucauldian concepts (e.g. governance and regulation, ordering powers and steering processes, systems of meaning, soft and hard rules).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a growing body of literature on globalization and higher education that documents the degree to which universities around the world conform to the same organizational blueprints (Lindblad and Lindblad 2009). World-society theorists, in particular, provide a compelling account of the global spread of tertiary education and its strong isomorphic tendencies, recognizing that “The same subjects are…taught with the same perspectives leading to very similar degrees and to credentials that take on world-wide meaning” (Schofer and Meyer 2005, 917).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%