Transnational Memories, National Memory Regimes: Commemorating the Armenian Genocide in Germany

Nienass, Benjamin

doi:10.1353/gsr.2020.0006

German Studies Review

2020

DOI: 10.1353/gsr.2020.0006

|View full text |Cite

Transnational Memories, National Memory Regimes: Commemorating the Armenian Genocide in Germany

Benjamin Nienass¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space

Lleshaj

2024

Perspect. polit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How do societies navigate the symbolic and artistic heritage of troubled pasts? I build on Bernhard and Kubik’s (2014) theorization of official memory regimes to demonstrate how memory regimes govern the public mnemonic space beyond the official level. I trace such governance within what Bernhard and Kubik call a unified memory regime, in which official actors prefer not to fight battles in and around memory. I argue that unified memory regimes order, discipline, and govern not only the official but also the everyday spaces of judgment and affection. Posited on unity at the official level, these hegemonic frames of meaning-making relegate mnemonic tension to the societal level where discursive battles continue to take place. I further argue that unified memory regimes can open pitfalls for pluralists during moments of mnemonic contestation. Because pluralists acknowledge and agonistically deliberate on multiple interpretations of the past, they may attempt to discursively reconcile the emerging societal-level mnemonic fracture with the official unified memory regime. But this strategy can backfire, reinforcing the unified regime and disciplining the societal-level challenger through three discursive practices that I call the traps of consensus: semantic alignment, a syntax of disavowal, and the juxtaposition of “universal” and “particular” narratives about the past. Pluralists may be especially vulnerable to these traps when they face unified memory regimes in which the consensus narrative appears superficially pluralist (or “underspecified”) because it eschews normative judgments that distinguish between perpetrators and victims. I illustrate these dynamics through tracing the case of a contested soundscape in postcommunist Albania.

show abstract

Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space

Lleshaj

2024

Perspect. polit.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Transnational Memories, National Memory Regimes: Commemorating the Armenian Genocide in Germany

Cited by 1 publication

References 28 publications

Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space

Torture to Their Ears, Music to Ours: Memory Regimes and the Ordering of Political Space

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About