Transnational migrant labor, split labor markets, and workers’ boundary-making practices in a Chinese state-sponsored workplace in Ecuador

Abstract

Existing research on transnationalization of labor documents split labor markets between less-skilled (im)migrant workers and native workers in the host countries. But there is little research on how labor relations take shape when relatively skilled workers migrate from more developed countries to work temporarily in less-developed countries in the Global South. Based on ethnographic research on a Chinese state-sponsored construction project in Ecuador, this article explicates an understudied case. Although the temporary migrant Chinese workers come from a more developed country and hold higher status jobs, they are compensated at a lower rate and have fewer labor rights compared to their lower status Ecuadorian counterparts. By comparatively examining workers’ everyday interactions and boundary-making practices, this study develops a twofold argument. First, the development strategies and political interests of the home and host states interact to shape divergent recruitment processes and labor policies, which gives rise to disparate working conditions and labor rights between migrant and native workers. Second, the foreign migrant and native workers cope with labor disparities by invoking national stereotypes to draw social boundaries, which exacerbates their labor market splits. This analysis has theoretical implications for understanding labor relations under transnational state capitalism, workers’ strategies against labor control, and the future of labor solidarity in the Global South.

Traveller studies in low- and middle-income countries: a critical gap in global antibiotic resistance surveillance

“…9 In 2014, over 7000 temporary migrant Chinese workers were known to be in Ecuador for Chinese-owned projects, accounting for nearly one-third of all Chinese workers in Latin America. 10 While China largely imports agricultural products and raw materials from Latin American countries, it primarily exports technology, expertise and support services for state-owned infrastructure projects, 10 suggesting that human mobilization associated with Chinese-owned infrastructure projects could be the underlying cause for shared bla CTX gene epidemiology between these two world regions.…”