2017
DOI: 10.1177/0117196817747102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transnational mobility, strong states and contested sovereignty: Learning from the China–Taiwan context

Abstract: Mobility across the Taiwan Strait has intensified since the border was opened in 1987. The cross-border social, cultural and economic exchanges, however, have remained closely embedded in the nationalistic logic specific to cross-Strait relations. Employing a state-centered approach and building on a comparative analysis of the interaction between Beijing and two groups of cross-Strait migrants (mainland spouses in Taiwan, and Taiwanese investors in China), this paper examines the various ways in which a state… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to PRC migrants in Taiwan, the limited scholarship on their identity formation is focused on how structural constraints on their everyday lives, such as the impact of legal restrictions, Taiwanese nationalism, partisan politics and national security, eventually shaped the way they expressed either their Chinese or their Taiwanese identity in public and private spheres (Momesso, ; Momesso and Lee, ). Little is said about their self‐perception.…”
Section: Exploring National Identity In the Cross‐strait Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to PRC migrants in Taiwan, the limited scholarship on their identity formation is focused on how structural constraints on their everyday lives, such as the impact of legal restrictions, Taiwanese nationalism, partisan politics and national security, eventually shaped the way they expressed either their Chinese or their Taiwanese identity in public and private spheres (Momesso, ; Momesso and Lee, ). Little is said about their self‐perception.…”
Section: Exploring National Identity In the Cross‐strait Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%