2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2324-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral incisionless fundoplication for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in clinical practice

Abstract: BackgroundTransoral incisionless fundoplication is a recently introduced endoluminal technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The objective of this study was to determine outcomes in chronic GERD patients who were referred for surgical management.MethodsA cohort of 38 patients underwent transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) in a tertiary care setting. Pre- and post-procedure assessment included GERD-related quality of life questionnaires, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) usage, 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately long-term data regarding efficacy of this device are limited to a small number of subjects and short duration of follow-up ( 97 ). A recent study suggested that at 36 months of follow-up, the majority of patients had required additional medical therapy or a revisional fundoplication ( 98 ).…”
Section: Summary Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately long-term data regarding efficacy of this device are limited to a small number of subjects and short duration of follow-up ( 97 ). A recent study suggested that at 36 months of follow-up, the majority of patients had required additional medical therapy or a revisional fundoplication ( 98 ).…”
Section: Summary Of the Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six months after TIF, GERD symptoms had improved according to the reduction in GERD-HRQL scores (from 26 [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]) to 10 [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], P < 0.01). Common use of acid suppressive medication was discontinued by 67% of patients, whereas 19% used PPIs occasionally and common use was present in 14%.…”
Section: Patient Characteristics and Symptom Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Previous studies have attempted to identify patient characteristics and objective parameters like lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting pressure and the number of fasteners that may help to predict treatment outcome of the TIF procedure. 9,10 However, up to now, no objective parameter is available to select patients for this endoluminal procedure. Increased esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility is considered a pathophysiologic factor in GERD as EGJ compliance determines the opening diameter of the EGJ and consequently the volume of reflux content into the esophagus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a total of 5 (13.5 %) patients underwent additional procedures within 3-6 months including two patients who had a repeat TIF procedure and 3 that subsequently underwent LNF [16]. However, in a series of 38 patients at 36 months follow-up, 37 % (14/38) of patients requested revisional LNF because of persistent GERD symptoms [17]. Further analysis of patients undergoing conversion from TIF to LNF have shown no increased operative morbidity [19].…”
Section: Outcomes and Results Of Tifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, in a different study, only 8/19 (42 %) of patients were completely off PPIs, while 32 % (6/19) were taking occasional PPIs and 26 % (5/19) were taking daily PPIs at 36 months [17]. Most patients that had dysphagia before the procedure had improved swallowing after TIF (24/27, 89 %), and no patients developed new dysphagia [14 • ].…”
Section: Outcomes and Results Of Tifmentioning
confidence: 99%