Transoral Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis of an Unrepaired Bilateral Alveolar Cleft

Tate, Gregory S.; Tharanon, Wichit; Sinn, Douglas P.

doi:10.1097/00001665-199907000-00015

Cited by 22 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 98 articles identified in the PUBMED search, 72 (73.46%) were related to cleft maxillary osteotomy 1,2,4-6,8,9,11-14,15,19,22,24-26,28-33,35,38-44,46-52,56, 58,60,61,63-67,69-72,74-80,82,84-86,88-90,97-99, 101,103,106,107 , and 26 (26.537%) to cleft maxillary distraction 7,10,17,18,20,21,27, 34,36,37,45,[53][54][55]57,59,68,73,81,87,[92][93][94][95][96]100,104 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis

Cheung¹,

Chua²

2006

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

157

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis

Cheung¹,

Chua²

2006

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

157

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Many other studies have evaluated the effectiveness of DO in the treatment of cleft lip and palate patients suffering from maxillary deficiency. [11][12][13] The pitfall of the surgery is the lack of vector control and development of an anterior open bite. [14] Conclusion AMOD is a good therapeutic procedure to relish the esthetic improvement and establish a good occlusal relationship.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis for cleft lip and palate patients - A case series

Pai¹,

Nitin²,

Raghunath³

et al. 2018

ijmdcr

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has become a mainstream surgical technique for patients with jaw deformities. This case report describes the surgical orthodontic treatment of maxillary hypoplasia in two patients of 14-19 years with cleft lip and palate. They were treated with anterior maxillary DO using rigid intraoral distractor device. Distraction was started after the initial latency period with activation of 0.8 mm/day until positive overjet was gained. Cephalometric analysis was performed twice for evaluation: Before surgery (Pre-Rx) and after distraction (Post-Rx). Both the distractions completed smoothly and maxilla was distracted efficiently. Maxillary prominence increased in both the patients with a positive overjet after distraction. DO provided an effective way to correct maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate.

show abstract

“…Two types of distraction devices have been used for maxillary advancement: external and internal distraction devices. Besides being more tolerable, 13 intraoral devices are also advantageous as they are placed over the bone and do not require additional anchorage from the teeth. 14 The external systems require anchoring teeth in the maxillary arch and a retention period of 4Y6 months with a facemask after removal of the devices, undesirable mesial movement of the anchoring teeth cannot be prevented as an adverse effect.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%