2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer — Technical updates and long-term results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that RT and CRT for pharyngeal cancer are accompanied by the risk of laryngopharyngeal dysfunction 3 and carotid artery stenosis/thrombus 4 as late adverse events. On the other hand, several recent reports 6 , 12 and the findings of the present study suggest that TOVS is a minimally invasive treatment with favorable postoperative laryngopharyngeal function and acceptable complications.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should also be noted that RT and CRT for pharyngeal cancer are accompanied by the risk of laryngopharyngeal dysfunction 3 and carotid artery stenosis/thrombus 4 as late adverse events. On the other hand, several recent reports 6 , 12 and the findings of the present study suggest that TOVS is a minimally invasive treatment with favorable postoperative laryngopharyngeal function and acceptable complications.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The surgical field was sometimes limited, especially for PC and PW lesions, and we occasionally experienced difficulty in securing negative mucosal margins for these lesions. Recently, various surgical instruments have been developed for transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), 15 endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS), 16 , 17 and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) 18 , 19 and the usefulness of a curved blade for the FKWO retractor 12 has been reported. To address this weakness, we recommend these instruments and techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, TOVS has many advantages as a minimally invasive surgery; however, there have only been a few reports on treatment outcomes and safety ( 8 , 9 ). Recently, Tomifuji et al reported the long-term treatment outcomes of 90 patients with hypopharyngeal cancer and 25 patients with supraglottic cancer who underwent TOVS, including advanced T3 or T4 lesions treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or before surgery or cases of failed radiation therapy, in their single institutional retrospective observational study ( 10 ). A total of 83 patients with fresh hypopharyngeal cancer (6 with Tis, 18 with T1, 45 with T2, 12 with T3, and 2 with T4) had a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 83.2%, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 94.3%, and 5-year larynx preservation rate (LPR) of 94.6%.…”
Section: Tovs In Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transoral surgery (TOS) has been reported as useful for resecting Tis, T1, T2, and selected T3 stages of laryngopharyngeal cancer [4]. Moreover, it has been recently reported that TOS can resect lesions that underwent treatment failure after definitive radiation therapy (RT) or those that develop additional primary lesions within the RT field [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%