Transorale Parathyreoidektomie

Dralle, Henning

doi:10.1007/s00104-014-2903-y

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Karakas first reported the transoral endoscopic parathyroidectomy via the floor of the mouth in 2010 31,37,38 . However, they terminated their pilot study because of poor patient acceptance and the high complication rate 39,40 . Another approach, that is, via the inferior vestibule, became a better means of establishing the transoral approach.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…31,37,38 However, they terminated their pilot study because of poor patient acceptance and the high complication rate. 39,40 Another approach, that is, via the inferior vestibule, became a better means of establishing the transoral approach. The original endoscopic parathyroidectomy by the transoral approach via the inferior vestibule was described by Udelsman et al in 2016, 41 following the development of this vestibular approach for thyroidectomy.…”

Section: Endoscopic and Robotic Transoral Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Scoping review of approaches used for remote‐access parathyroidectomy: A contemporary review of techniques, tools, pros and cons

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After our coauthors described the first remote-access parathyroidectomy (RAP) series in 2000, several other approaches were developed. No systematic review has been performed to classify and evaluate RAP techniques. We performed a literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL). A total of 71 studies met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. RAP can be categorized into five approaches: (1) endoscopic and robotic axillary, (2) anterior chest, (3) transoral, (4) retroauricular, and (5) a combination of these approaches. The limited data in the literature suggest that the cure rates and safety of RAP are in no way inferior to those of open parathyroidectomy. Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and the recommendations for the selection of each approach are listed. The selection of approach methods might depend on the surgeon's experience and familiarity and the patient's preference and disease status.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%