Transparency and the efficiency of multi-actor decision-making processes: an empirical analysis of 244 decisions in the European Union

Abstract

Studies into decision-making suggest the existence of a tension between transparent and efficient decision-making. It is assumed that an increase in transparency leads to a decline in the efficiency of decision-making processes; however, this assumption has not been tested empirically. This study provides a starting point for investigating the complex relationship between transparency and efficiency on a set of 244 European Union legislative processes between 2014 and 2019. It finds that transparency neither speeds up nor slows down decision-making processes, and that the efficiency of the lawmaking process depends on political complexity. Our results call for further systematic research into the causes and consequences of decision-making transparency. Points for practitioners In decision-making processes, transparency is widely seen as both a blessing and a curse. On the one hand, it is seen as a virtue that fosters legitimacy and participation; on the other hand, it is said to reduce decisional efficiency. However, our study of 244 European Union legislative processes shows that transparency has no effect on their duration. This calls for a re-appreciation of the effects of transparency in decision-making processes.

The Impact of Good Governance on the Quality of Public Management Decision Making

“…The provision of transparent and readily accessible information serves as a deterrent against corrupt practises and the misuse of authority [15]. Decisions that are characterised by transparency have the potential to be more effectively scrutinised and evaluated by stakeholders [16]. Furthermore, the promotion of good governance also serves to foster increased engagement of the general public in the decision-making processes pertaining to public management.…”

Openness as a new communication strategy for political parties

“…One possible reason could be that understanding the advantages of transparency, participation and collaboration takes some time. However, given the doubts surrounding this issue, the relationship of transparency and openness policies with trust and legitimacy should be addressed in future research, as already suggested by Brandsma and Meijer (2020) and Grimmelikhuijsen et al (2020).…”

Trilogues in Council: disrupting the diplomatic culture?

“…Particularly in Coreper 1, some presidencies are instructed vigorously from their capitals, reducing their flexibility (R94). But ministerial involvement appears quite common: in the 2014-2019 EP term, for 249 files a trilogue procedure has been started (Brandsma & Meijer, 2020), and the Council's document register shows that for 89 of these a general approach was adopted prior to negotiations, which is 36 per cent.…”