Forensic Anthropology and the United States Judicial System 2019
DOI: 10.1002/9781119469957.ch5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparency in forensic anthropology through the implementation of quality assurance practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exceptions to this rule included easily replicable measurements (e.g., ectoconchion) or visually apparent points of maximum curvature (e.g., opisthion). All bilateral and midsagittal landmarks were unambiguously defined prior to data collection (Table 2, Figure 2) following the definitions provided by Howells (1973), Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994), and Fleischman et al (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exceptions to this rule included easily replicable measurements (e.g., ectoconchion) or visually apparent points of maximum curvature (e.g., opisthion). All bilateral and midsagittal landmarks were unambiguously defined prior to data collection (Table 2, Figure 2) following the definitions provided by Howells (1973), Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994), and Fleischman et al (2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%