2018
DOI: 10.1257/jel.20171350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

Abstract: Abstract:There is growing interest in enhancing research transparency and reproducibility in economics and other scientific fields. We survey existing work on these topics within economics, and discuss the evidence suggesting that publication bias, inability to replicate, and specification searching remain widespread in the discipline. We next discuss recent progress in this area, including through improved research design, study registration and pre-analysis plans, disclosure standards, and open sharing of da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 299 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 339 publications
(325 reference statements)
4
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It plays a critical role in controlling the impact of sampling error, questionable research practices, publication bias and fraud [1,2]. An increase in the effort to replicate studies has been argued to help establishing credibility within a field [3]. Moreover, replications allow us to test if results generalize to a different or larger population and help to verify the underlying theory [2,4,5] and its scope [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It plays a critical role in controlling the impact of sampling error, questionable research practices, publication bias and fraud [1,2]. An increase in the effort to replicate studies has been argued to help establishing credibility within a field [3]. Moreover, replications allow us to test if results generalize to a different or larger population and help to verify the underlying theory [2,4,5] and its scope [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this stage, it is important to distinguish the quality of the management of the research process from the quality of the research itself. A stream of the economic literature focuses on the related problem of transparency and selection bias in methods and results in academic journals (Christensen and Miguel, 2018). These papers focus on the replicability of certain econometric methods, leading not only to practices such as cherry‐picking and publication biases but also to the failure of replication due to opacity in the research process (Ioannidis, 2005).…”
Section: Reproducible Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, journal's policies may not ensure reproducibility of the research because either the shared numerical materials are provided with a low quality (McCullough, 2018) or because of human or resources constraints. Christensen and Miguel (2018) note that a large share of published papers has a data exemption, mostly for confidential reasons. Even if this might be an obstacle to the enforcement of those policies, it should not refrain good practices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Overall, research endeavors in the context of Third-Republic France are bound to be hindered by the lack of a shared frame of reference that would not only ease researchers efforts by generating economies of scale, but also improve reproducibility and interoperability across scientific studies. 14,15 To alleviate these issues and empower research programs in this context, this article proposes a comprehensive geographic information system of Third-Republic France: the TRF-GIS. It provides annual nomenclatures (codifications and toponymies) along with shapefiles of administrative constituencies of metropolitan France (mainland France and Corsica) from 1870 to 1940-901 nomenclatures and 830 shapefiles in total.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%