2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-018-1903-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparent hole-collecting and buffer layers for heterojunction solar cells based on n-type-doped silicon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the PCE and FF values of the devices using MoO 3 are reduced with a rise in annealing temperature, indicating the thermal instability of the MoO 3 /Ag contact structure above 100 °C due to the chemical sensitivity of MoO x . 23,31,32 Additionally, the PCE and FF of the p-Si solar cells with a CuI rear contact before and after thermal…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the PCE and FF values of the devices using MoO 3 are reduced with a rise in annealing temperature, indicating the thermal instability of the MoO 3 /Ag contact structure above 100 °C due to the chemical sensitivity of MoO x . 23,31,32 Additionally, the PCE and FF of the p-Si solar cells with a CuI rear contact before and after thermal…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce the undesired effect of parasitic absorption of the emitter and buffer layer at the HJ cell front side, one approach could be the reduction of both thicknesses. However, as widely known, the buffer layer cannot be reduced below 5 nm to avoid the reduction of crystalline silicon surface passivation . Instead, the effect of emitter thickness reduction on the cell FF is evident from the data reported in Figure .…”
Section: Numerical Simulations Of Hj Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most of the intrinsic properties of any material used in the device simulations, such as E g , μ, χ, optical absorptions, and refractive indexes, are deduced from experimental measurements and are listed in Table 2. In Figure 2, the absorption coefficients and the refractive indexes of the materials used in the numerical simulations (c-Si, a-Si:H, and SiOx:H deposited as described in another work 14 ) are deduced from reflectance and transmittance spectroscopy and ellipsometric measurements, respectively, and then compared. To focus the numerical simulations on the solar cell FF, a top-down approach is used, starting from an optimal solar cell with efficiency very close to the physical limit achievable with the a-Si:…”
Section: Numerical Simulations Of Hj Solar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Some of them have high optical transparency combined with low electric resistivity, which allows their use as transparent contacts in photoelectric devices. [6][7][8] They are in particular promising for silicon-based solar cells with efficiency up to 22%. [6] Substantial difference in electron work functions between silicon (Si) and most metal oxides (MOs) results in energy band bending, providing an enhanced separation of photogenerated charge carriers at the interface of MO/Si heterostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Substantial difference in electron work functions between silicon (Si) and most metal oxides (MOs) results in energy band bending, providing an enhanced separation of photogenerated charge carriers at the interface of MO/Si heterostructures. It has been already demonstrated for heterostructures with semiconducting oxides such as MoO x , [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] VO x , [15][16][17] WO x , [18,19] NiO x and TiO x , [7,20,21] CuO x , and [22,23] MoS x [24] having bandgaps in the range of 3.0À3.8 eV and electron work functions between 4.5 and 6.5 eV. [24] Meanwhile, mechanisms of the charge carrier separation at the MO/Si interfaces and subsequent carrier transport through the MO layers have not been analyzed in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%