2008
DOI: 10.1089/end.2007.0329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transperineal Microwave Thermoablation in Patients with Obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Phase I Clinical Study with a New Mini-Choked Microwave Applicator

Abstract: The AMICA-PROBE is a safe, well-tolerated, and repeatable method to treat BPH with microwave thermotherapy. The spheroid lesions obtained demonstrated the maximal control over the radial and longitudinal coagulative effects of the therapy. Phase II studies are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of this new probe.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…minimising the size (gauge) of the applicator, maximising the available power for tissue irradiation, and full control over the coagulation size and shape, thus avoiding back‐heating phenomena (the ‘comet’ effect) due to uncontrolled microwave power reflection, and yielding spheroid lesions close to the applicator tip. We developed a new microwave probe for interstitial thermoablation, the Amica‐Probe v3 (Hospital Services SpA, Aprilia, Italy) which is a development of a previously described applicator (Amica‐Probe v2 [9];) which, while retaining the essential benefit of its predecessor (small gauge, 17 G; internal water cooling to avoid shaft overheating; and a patented built‐in device, the ‘mini‐choke’, to entrap reflected microwaves, capable of producing spheroidal lesions), provides enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. The first aim was to evaluate tolerability and the ability to produce complete and homogeneous tissue ablation without tissue ‘skipping’ in the treated area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…minimising the size (gauge) of the applicator, maximising the available power for tissue irradiation, and full control over the coagulation size and shape, thus avoiding back‐heating phenomena (the ‘comet’ effect) due to uncontrolled microwave power reflection, and yielding spheroid lesions close to the applicator tip. We developed a new microwave probe for interstitial thermoablation, the Amica‐Probe v3 (Hospital Services SpA, Aprilia, Italy) which is a development of a previously described applicator (Amica‐Probe v2 [9];) which, while retaining the essential benefit of its predecessor (small gauge, 17 G; internal water cooling to avoid shaft overheating; and a patented built‐in device, the ‘mini‐choke’, to entrap reflected microwaves, capable of producing spheroidal lesions), provides enhanced mechanical and electrical properties. The first aim was to evaluate tolerability and the ability to produce complete and homogeneous tissue ablation without tissue ‘skipping’ in the treated area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was 4.8 (range, 3-7). The mean RENAL score was 9.4 (range, [8][9][10][11][12]. Table I shows the clinical and laboratory characteristics of enrolled patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system used for MWTA was HS AMICA, with the Amica-probe V4 applicator (Hospital Services SpA, Aprilia, Italy), which is a technical development of a previously described applicator (Amica-probe V3) (12). Amica-probe V4 includes a coaxial antenna and an integrated hydraulic circuit to cool the coaxial feeding line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the only clinically relevant quantity is the power irradiated into the target tissues, which is significantly lower than the nominal power, and generally differs from system to system even for equal nominal power levels. Early MWA technologies suffered from the poor predictability of the radiated field pattern and from uncontrolled back-heating effects (often referred to in literature as "comet effect" [53,54] ) due to the reflected waves (i.e., MW radiations not absorbed by the target tissues and back-propagating along the probe shaft outer walls) generated by the inevitable impedance mismatches between the antenna and the tissues. On the one hand, this caused unwanted, deep cauterisation of tissues along the probe shaft, increasing the risk of complications; on the other hand, it reduced the antenna efficiency, dispersing the MW field longitudinally rather than focussing it on the probe distal end.…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 99%