2017
DOI: 10.1002/uog.15931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery following induction of labor

Abstract: AOP may be a useful sonographic parameter for predicting successful vaginal delivery among nulliparous women at term undergoing IOL; an AOP wider than 92° is associated with a high rate of vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the inclusion of psAOP does not improve the predictive performance achieved by maternal factors and previous vaginal delivery. AOP is the most studied TPU parameter for the prediction of successful induction, but the results are contradictory [12,13]. Our results are consistent with those reported by Pereira et al [12], who evaluated the measurement of AOP by the sagittal approach (sAOP) prior to IOL in 99 singleton pregnancies at 35-42 weeks and showed that only transvaginal cervical length assessment, but not sAOP, was associated with the prediction of successful vaginal delivery and induction-todelivery interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the inclusion of psAOP does not improve the predictive performance achieved by maternal factors and previous vaginal delivery. AOP is the most studied TPU parameter for the prediction of successful induction, but the results are contradictory [12,13]. Our results are consistent with those reported by Pereira et al [12], who evaluated the measurement of AOP by the sagittal approach (sAOP) prior to IOL in 99 singleton pregnancies at 35-42 weeks and showed that only transvaginal cervical length assessment, but not sAOP, was associated with the prediction of successful vaginal delivery and induction-todelivery interval.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our results are consistent with those reported by Pereira et al [12], who evaluated the measurement of AOP by the sagittal approach (sAOP) prior to IOL in 99 singleton pregnancies at 35-42 weeks and showed that only transvaginal cervical length assessment, but not sAOP, was associated with the prediction of successful vaginal delivery and induction-todelivery interval. On the contrary, our results differ from a recent prospective, observational study in 150 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy with a low Bishop score (< 7) undergoing IOL at term [13]. The authors demonstrated that the sAOP, but not cervical length assessed by TPU scan, was independently associated with successful induction and that an sAOP of > 92° was associated with a successful vaginal delivery in 95% of women, with a false-positive rate of 15%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some studies have shown that these ultrasonic measurements are superior to digital assessment, their predictive values remain suboptimal for clinical use. 7,8 One main reason for this is the inability to measure cervical consistency, a major component of BS, using conventional ultrasound technology. Hence strain-based sonoelastography has also been investigated for measuring uterine cervical stiffness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%