Transpiration and Stomatal Conductance of Roses Cv Sonia Grown With Supplemental Lighting.

Slootweg, G.; Meeteren, U. van

doi:10.17660/actahortic.1991.298.12

Cited by 21 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the mechanisms behind stomatal movements usually provide a robust and fault-tolerant system, it is susceptible to disruption under certain conditions, leading to a reduced ability of the stomata to close in response to stimuli that normally provoke stomatal closure. This disruption of stomatal behaviour has been observed in plants grown in vitro (Brainerd and Fuchigami, 1982; Ziv et al , 1987; Santamaria et al , 1993; Hazarika, 2006) and also after long-term exposure to some environmental conditions such as continuous light (Slootweg and van Meeteren, 1991; Mortensen and Gislerød, 1999; Pettersen et al , 2007; Arve et al , 2012), ozone (O 3 ) (Paoletti, 2005; Wilkinson and Davies, 2009), hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) (Lisjak et al , 2010), sulphur dioxide (SO 2 ) (Maier-Maercker and Koch, 1986), and, in particular, low vapour pressure deficit (VPD) (Torre and Fjeld, 2001; Rezaei Nejad and van Meeteren, 2005, 2007, 2008; Rezaei Nejad et al , 2006; Fanourakis et al , 2011; Arve et al , 2012). It is rather surprisingly that a single factor, such as low VPD, can disturb the robust system of stomatal control.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Can prolonged exposure to low VPD disturb the ABA signalling in stomatal guard cells?

Aliniaeifard

Meeteren

2013

Journal of Experimental Botany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response of stomata to many environmental factors is well documented. Multiple signalling pathways for abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure have been proposed over the last decades. However, it seems that exposure of a leaf for a long time (several days) to some environmental conditions generates a sort of memory in the guard cells that results in the loss of suitable responses of the stomata to closing stimuli, such as desiccation and ABA. In this review paper we discuss changes in the normal pattern of signal transduction that could account for disruption of guard cell signalling after long-term exposure to some environmental conditions, with special emphasis on long-term low vapour pressure deficit (VPD).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 80%

Can prolonged exposure to low VPD disturb the ABA signalling in stomatal guard cells?

Aliniaeifard

Meeteren

2013

Journal of Experimental Botany

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although the mechanisms involved in the stomatal movements usually provide a robust and fault-tolerant system, this control system can be disturbed under certain environmental conditions, leading to a reduced closing capacity of stomata in response to stimuli that usually induce stomatal closure (Aliniaeifard and van Meeteren 2013). Reduced closing ability of stomata has been shown in plants produced in vitro (Brainerd and Fuchigami 1982, Ziv et al 1987, Santamaria et al 1993, Hazarika 2006, after prolonged exposure to some environmental pollutants such as ozone, sulfur dioxide and hydrogen sulfide (Maier-Maercker and Koch 1986, Paoletti 2005, Wilkinson and Davies 2009, Lisjak et al 2010, Aliniaeifard and van Meeteren 2013, after growing plants under continuous light (Slootweg and van Meeteren 1991, Mortensen and Gislerød 1999, Pettersen et al 2007, Arve et al 2012, or after growing at low VPD (Torre and Fjeld 2001, Rezaei Nejad and van Meeteren 2005, 2008, Rezaei Nejad et al 2006, Fanourakis et al 2011, Arve et al 2012, Aliniaeifard and van Meeteren 2013. From these factors, low VPD showed the strongest negative effect on the stomatal closing response and the magnitude of stomatal malfunctioning induced by the other above mentioned environmental factors is more pronounced when these are applied together with low VPD (Aliniaeifard and van Meeteren 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stomatal malfunctioning under low VPD conditions: induced by alterations in stomatal morphology and leaf anatomy or in the ABA signaling?

Aliniaeifard

Matamoros²,

Meeteren³

2014

Physiologia Plantarum

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exposing plants to low VPD reduces leaf capacity to maintain adequate water status thereafter. To find the impact of VPD on functioning of stomata, stomatal morphology and leaf anatomy, fava bean plants were grown at low (L, 0.23 kPa) or moderate (M, 1.17 kPa) VPDs and some plants that developed their leaves at moderate VPD were then transferred for 4 days to low VPD (M→L). Part of the M→L-plants were sprayed with ABA (abscisic acid) during exposure to L. L-plants showed bigger stomata, larger pore area, thinner leaves and less spongy cells compared with M-plants. Stomatal morphology (except aperture) and leaf anatomy of the M→L-plants were almost similar to the M-plants, while their transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were identical to that of L-plants. The stomatal response to ABA was lost in L-plants, but also after 1-day exposure of M-plants to low VPD. The level of foliar ABA sharply decreased within 1-day exposure to L, while the level of ABA-GE (ABA-glucose ester) was not affected. Spraying ABA during the exposure to L prevented loss of stomatal closing response thereafter. The effect of low VPD was largely depending on exposure time: the stomatal responsiveness to ABA was lost after 1-day exposure to low VPD, while the responsiveness to desiccation was gradually lost during 4-day exposure to low VPD. Leaf anatomical and stomatal morphological alterations due to low VPD were not the main cause of loss of stomatal closure response to closing stimuli.

show abstract

“…Moreover, duration of the lighting period is very short in many places in the world. Extending the lighting period was the topic of extensive research during the last few decades in order to determine the best duration of lighting period (Slootweg and van Meeteren, 1991;Mortensen and Gislerød, 1999;Arve et al, 2013;Mortensen, 2014). Nowadays, extension of the natural lighting period using artificial light (supplementary lighting) is common in greenhouses, especially in winter.…”

Section: Greenhouse Lighting Conditions and Quality Of Productsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The importance of various preharvest factors (e.g., cultivar, agronomic practices, climatic conditions, degree of maturity at harvest time, time of harvest, and prevalence of diseases and pests) (Tijkens et al, 2003;Gruda, 2005;Hewett, 2006;Moretti et al, 2010;Tibaldi et al, 2011;Fanourakis et al, 2013b;Luna et al, 2013;Tudela et al, 2013) and postharvest factors (e.g., storage conditions, packaging and processing, transport and distribution) (Watada et al, 1996;Chiesa, 2003;Moretti et al, 2010) for the postharvest quality of horticultural products have been previously reported. Among the environmental preharvest factors, relative humidity (RH) (Rezaei Nejad and van Meeteren, 2005;Islam et al, 2010;Fanourakis et al, 2011Fanourakis et al, , 2013bAliniaeifard, 2014;Aliniaeifard and van Meeteren, 2016) and lighting conditions (Slootweg and van Meeteren, 1991;Fjeld et al, 1994;Mortensen and Fjeld, 1998;Mortensen andGislerød, 1999, 2011;Pettersen et al, 2007;Arve et al, 2013;Witkowska, 2013;Islam et al, 2014;Mortensen, 2014;Ouzounis et al, 2016) attracted lots of attention for their impact on postharvest quality of horticultural products.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Greenhouse vapour pressure deficit and lighting conditions during growth can influence postharvest quality through the functioning of stomata

Aliniaeifard¹,

Meeteren²

2018

Acta Hortic.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is a tendency in horticulture to grow plants in greenhouses with high humidity and prolonged light periods, especially in winter. Although plants grow well in greenhouses with high relative humidity (RH) (low vapour pressure deficit; VPD), the plants produced under such greenhouse climates have limited control over water loss after harvest, leading to uncontrolled transpiration and decreased water content in the postharvest stage. This results in shortened vase-life of cut flowers and decreased quality of leafy vegetables. When plants had been produced in greenhouses with moderate humidity and natural day length, their stomata close when they are exposed to stomata closure-promoting environments (low RH, desiccation and darkness), as usually happens during the postharvest stage. However, in greenhouses with low VPD conditions and long photoperiods, stomata will not fully close during the postharvest stage; even decreased leaf water content will not result in full stomatal closure (stomatal malfunctioning) in products coming from those greenhouses. In this paper, greenhouse climate factors during the growth of plants that induce stomatal malfunctioning in the postharvest stage will be characterised. Approaches will be discussed to improve stomatal functionality under such greenhouse conditions in order to increase vase-and shelf-lives of products.

show abstract

Transpiration and Stomatal Conductance of Roses Cv Sonia Grown With Supplemental Lighting.

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Can prolonged exposure to low VPD disturb the ABA signalling in stomatal guard cells?

Can prolonged exposure to low VPD disturb the ABA signalling in stomatal guard cells?

Stomatal malfunctioning under low VPD conditions: induced by alterations in stomatal morphology and leaf anatomy or in the ABA signaling?

Greenhouse vapour pressure deficit and lighting conditions during growth can influence postharvest quality through the functioning of stomata

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About