2015
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2015.2446480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport Abstraction Models for an SDN-Controlled Centralized RAN

Abstract: In a centralized radio access network (C-RAN) scenario the joint coordination of radio (e.g., remote radio units, baseband units) and transport (e.g., optical cross connects) resources can be achieved via software defined networking (SDN) control plane, where a global orchestrator harmonizes the use of resources across all network segments. The more accurate the information about each domain (i.e., the abstraction of wireless and transport resources) is, the better will be the outcome of the orchestration work… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, SDWN controllers can still be distributed and also perform centralized logical functions, such as global topology mapping, neighbor wireless resource information retrieving, link discovery, and radio monitoring. It is also worth mentioning that some of the current SDWN proposals are distributed and present hierarchical organization of controllers that provides partial control centralization [10,13]. Such distribution enable controllers to decrease management complexity keeping part of the centralization benefits [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, SDWN controllers can still be distributed and also perform centralized logical functions, such as global topology mapping, neighbor wireless resource information retrieving, link discovery, and radio monitoring. It is also worth mentioning that some of the current SDWN proposals are distributed and present hierarchical organization of controllers that provides partial control centralization [10,13]. Such distribution enable controllers to decrease management complexity keeping part of the centralization benefits [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [16], the authors proposed an SDWN controller able to cope with radio resource management at physical layer. Whereas, in [13], three transport models were proposed to measure the efficiency of employing SDWN concepts in a C-RAN optimizing its usage. The authors of [10], proposed a hierarchical composition of controllers, responsible for different parts of the network, namely radio, optical, and BBU controller.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered C-RAN scenario is similar to the one analyzed in [12]. However, in this paper we include a new constraint, i.e., the maximum distance between remote radio units (RRUs) and baseband processing units (BBUs), which plays an important role in terms of overall system performance.…”
Section: Abstraction Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12] we proposed two simple transport abstraction models for centralized radio access networks (C-RANs) with orchestration of radio and transport resources. These models, referred to as big switch (BiS) and virtual link (VL), are an adaptation of well-known transport abstraction models [13] and are designed specifically for a C-RAN scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In TWDM-PON-enabled fronthaul, a virtual PON is formed when a group of ONUs transfer data using the same wavelength. As shown in [27], based on the software defined network (SDN) technique, different transport abstractions can be achieved in the centralized controller, which results in better performance of the C-RAN. Besides, we also take common public radio interface (CPRI) compression techniques [37][38][39] into consideration, since the typical CPRI physical link rate is fixed [19].…”
Section: Inlp Model Formulation For Comp-oriented Fronthaulmentioning
confidence: 99%