“…Furthermore, the occurrence of chemical heterogeneities and roughness on any of the approaching surfaces can significantly modify their interfacial interactions (Johnson et al., 2010; Torkzaban & Bradford, 2016; Tufenkji & Elimelech, 2005). Relevant xDLVO interactions to this work include: charge screening from changes in ionic strength, which affect the EDL (Mills et al., 1994; Molnar, Johnson, et al., 2015; Polemio et al., 1980); steric interactions (ST) from surface adsorption of naturally occurring dissolved organic matter (Babakhani et al., 2017; Chen & Elimelech, 2006; Leuther et al., 2020; Molnar, Gerhard, et al., 2015; Morales, Sang, et al., 2011; Morales, Zhang, et al., 2011; Patiño et al., 2020; Phenrat et al., 2008); polar or Lewis acid‐base interactions (AB) from the electron‐acceptor and electron‐donor nature of the two approaching materials (Van Oss, 2006); and hydrophobic interactions (HYD) between the particles and air bubbles under unsaturated conditions (Birdi, 2008; Crist et al., 2005; Kohli & Mittal, 2015). While substantial progress has been made to account for the pertinent colloidal interactions in typical groundwater systems, relating these surface energetics to pore‐scale and Darcy‐scale observations is not straight forward.…”