2018
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl080601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of Mass and Energy in Mercury's Plasma Sheet

Abstract: We examined the transport of mass and energy in Mercury's plasma sheet (PS) using MESSENGER magnetic field and plasma measurements obtained during 759 PS crossings. Regression analysis of proton density and plasma pressure shows a strong linear relationship. We calculated the polytropic index γ for Mercury's PS to be ~0.687, indicating that the plasma in the tail PS behaves nonadiabatically as it is transported sunward. Using the average magnetic field intensity of Mercury's tail lobe as a proxy for magnetotai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Mercury, if one considered a proton density of ∼3 cm −3 (Gershman et al, ; Poh et al, ; Sun et al, ), and the relatively thin current sheet width in Mercury's tail near midnight is ∼2 R M where 1 R M ∼2,440 km (Poh et al, ; Rong et al, ; Sun et al, ), then the global dawn‐dusk extent is ∼37 d i , comparable to our 31 d i case studied here. While for Earth, the proton density in the plasma sheet is around an order of magnitude smaller than that at Mercury (Baumjohann et al, ; Huang & Frank, ; Sun et al, ), and the width of the relatively thin current sheet near midnight is ∼20 R E (Nakai et al, ; Zhang et al, ), corresponding to ∼300 d i .…”
Section: Summary and Discussion On The Dawn‐dusk Asymmetrysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For Mercury, if one considered a proton density of ∼3 cm −3 (Gershman et al, ; Poh et al, ; Sun et al, ), and the relatively thin current sheet width in Mercury's tail near midnight is ∼2 R M where 1 R M ∼2,440 km (Poh et al, ; Rong et al, ; Sun et al, ), then the global dawn‐dusk extent is ∼37 d i , comparable to our 31 d i case studied here. While for Earth, the proton density in the plasma sheet is around an order of magnitude smaller than that at Mercury (Baumjohann et al, ; Huang & Frank, ; Sun et al, ), and the width of the relatively thin current sheet near midnight is ∼20 R E (Nakai et al, ; Zhang et al, ), corresponding to ∼300 d i .…”
Section: Summary and Discussion On The Dawn‐dusk Asymmetrysupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Proton density and pressure shown in Figure 2 were derived from 1 min average distributions of protons under the assumption that they are isotropic and stationary Maxwellian distributions (Gershman et al, 2013;Raines et al, 2011Raines et al, , 2013. The proton moments derived from this method were applied in several studies on the plasma sheet dynamics (Gershman et al, 2014;Poh et al, 2018;Raines et al, 2011;Sun et al, 2017Sun et al, , 2018. The proton density distribution (Figure 2, left) shows clear dawn-dusk asymmetry with proton densities higher on the dawnside (∼6 to 8 amu/cc) than on the duskside (∼2 to 4 amu/cc).…”
Section: Proton Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mercury's plasma sheet, the loss cone of protons ( α<arcsinBmaxBeq ) ranges from to 20° (Poh et al, 2018). Protons within the loss cone would impact the planetary surface and being absorbed (hereinafter referred to as surface precipitation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%