2010
DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/52/4/045017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of negative hydrogen and deuterium ions in RF-driven ion sources

Abstract: Abstract. Negative hydrogen ion sources are major components of neutral beam injection systems for plasma heating in future large-scale fusion experiments like ITER. In order to fulfill the requirements of the ITER neutral beam injection, a high-performance, large-area RF-driven ion source for negative ions is being developed at the MPI für Plasmaphysik. Negative hydrogen ions are mainly generated on a converter surface by impinging neutral particles and positive ions under the influence of magnetic fields and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Gutser et al, 11 23% of the produced negative ions can be extracted when the starting energy is 1 eV (with a magnetic filter field of 7 mT), but only 15% when the starting energy is 5 eV. We applied these different extraction factors to the two groups of negative ions.…”
Section: Negative Ion Extracted Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Gutser et al, 11 23% of the produced negative ions can be extracted when the starting energy is 1 eV (with a magnetic filter field of 7 mT), but only 15% when the starting energy is 5 eV. We applied these different extraction factors to the two groups of negative ions.…”
Section: Negative Ion Extracted Currentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for a fairly large beam θ c = 0.2 rad and α 0 = π /3, we have that 1 = 0.0579932 and current density is 6.5% less at beam center = 0 than it is at beam edge. For some H − sources it is speculated that current density is larger at beam edge, due to surface effects, 26,27 so that Eq. (25) is a closer approximation than a constant current is.…”
Section: B Beam Averaged Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(27) exploits an analogy with classical mechanics perturbation schemes; we introduce the auxiliary "position" q(s) = a A (s)p(s)/a A0 with a A0 = a A (0) and let "s" play the role of time; one initial condition q(0) = p(0) = 0 will be sufficient, because s = 0 is a singular point also of Eq. (27).…”
Section: Series Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most interesting case consists in a strong asymmetry of the extracted current density depending on the spatial distribution oh H-particles whose transport inside the source is affected by the magnets inserted in the EG to deflect the co-extracted electrons on the H-transport inside the source. This effect was predicted in [10] using 3D Monte Carlo method calculating the spatially resolved extraction probability for negative ions. In order to investigate the effect of such asymmetry on the beam optics a 3D electromagnetic analysis of the accelerator was carried out, by using macro-particles arranged so as to exhibit a current distribution reflecting the results of [10].…”
Section: Extracted Current Dlshomogeneitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the effect of such asymmetry on the beam optics a 3D electromagnetic analysis of the accelerator was carried out, by using macro-particles arranged so as to exhibit a current distribution reflecting the results of [10]. This was obtained by creating a dedicated emitter whose macro-particles carry an amount of current 1 which depends on the position on the [x,y] plane, according to the following formula modulating a simple Gaussian of width Gw into the e direction: (2) where 10 the is ray current assuming a homogeneous distribution among rays (10 is the total extracted current divided by the number of macro-particles in the simulations) and Pais the minimum of the extraction probability distribution, here set to a value of 0.6 to match the results of [10], as reported in figure 4.…”
Section: Extracted Current Dlshomogeneitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%