2016
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/62340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of Nitrogen Compounds through Subsoils in Agricultural Areas: Column Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, the NH 4 + -N migration distance in soil is very short. Large proportions of NH 4 + -N in the percolation water from paddy fields comes from the slow mineralization and decomposition of organic N in the subsoil rather than the slow migration of NH 4 + -N from fertilizers [23,33]. However, the current study found that the NH 4 + -N concentrations are clearly increased after fertilizer application in percolation water.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Generally, the NH 4 + -N migration distance in soil is very short. Large proportions of NH 4 + -N in the percolation water from paddy fields comes from the slow mineralization and decomposition of organic N in the subsoil rather than the slow migration of NH 4 + -N from fertilizers [23,33]. However, the current study found that the NH 4 + -N concentrations are clearly increased after fertilizer application in percolation water.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…Alternating wetting and drying changes the anaerobic environment caused by continuous fl ooding and accelerates the nitrifi cation process, which improved the consumption of NH 4 + -N and expedite NO 3 --N loading to the groundwater [10]. On the other hand, th e retardation factor and dynamic adsorption capacity for NO 3 -are lower than those for NH 4 + ions, and the migration velocity of NH 4 + in the subsoil is very small [35]. Thus the average NH 4 + -N concentrations from CID and AWD treatments at four growth stages for two years are kept on lower and stable values than NO 3 --N concentrations, and the leaching losses of NH 4 + -N were not signifi cantly different in AWD and CID.…”
Section: Effects On N and P Losses In Subsurface Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that biological nitrogen fixation from decades of historical agriculture in our study area created an influx of ammonia to the groundwater system, comparable to the contaminant plume studied in Bohkle et al (2006), which was observed to be travelling at a much slower rate than groundwater velocities suggest. On the other hand, nitrate moves through groundwater 5-10 times faster than ammonia (Fronczyk et al 2016), which may explain why both legacy and current NO 3 models performed similarly and no one model was clearly selected by AIC.…”
Section: Temporal Scale: Land-use Legacy Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%