2020
DOI: 10.1007/13836_2020_86
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposable Elements in Anopheles Species: Refining Annotation Strategies Towards Population Genomics Analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also assessed the phylogenetic distribution of the 64 new TE families in 15 species of the Anopheles genus, including the eight members of the An. gambiae complex, two more distantly related mosquitoes species (Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti) and Drosophila melanogaster (Additional file 1: Table S3) (36,59,60). We found that the new families were unevenly distributed among the members of the Anopheles genus (Figure 2C and Additional file 3: Figure S2C).…”
Section: New Anopheline Te Families Discovered In An Coluzziimentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also assessed the phylogenetic distribution of the 64 new TE families in 15 species of the Anopheles genus, including the eight members of the An. gambiae complex, two more distantly related mosquitoes species (Culex quinquefasciatus, Aedes aegypti) and Drosophila melanogaster (Additional file 1: Table S3) (36,59,60). We found that the new families were unevenly distributed among the members of the Anopheles genus (Figure 2C and Additional file 3: Figure S2C).…”
Section: New Anopheline Te Families Discovered In An Coluzziimentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This suggests that there are possibly other characteristics of each genome that affect the identification of high-quality TE families, such as biases in the location of the TE insertions given that TE families are challenging to identify in regions with low complexity or with numerous nested TEs. Nonetheless, the identification of TE families is dependent on the methodology used to perform TE annotations, therefore different annotation strategies could lead to the discovery of still undescribed families (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that there are possibly other characteristics of each genome that affected the identification of high-quality TE families, such as biases in the location of the TE insertions, given that TE families are challenging to identify in regions with low complexity or with numerous nested TEs. Nonetheless, the identification of TE families is dependent on the methodology used to perform TE annotations; therefore, other annotation strategies could lead to the discovery of still undescribed families ( Vargas-Chávez and González 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TE insertions have been annotated genome-wide in several anopheline species including An. coluzzii , most studies to date have characterized the TE repertoire in a single genome for each species (for review, see Vargas-Chávez and González 2020 ). To capture the full extent of TE natural variation and the potential consequences of TE insertions, it is necessary to evaluate multiple genomes to comprehensively assess diversity within a species ( Yang et al 2019 ; Bayer et al 2020 ; Weissensteiner et al 2020 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%