2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11265-009-0344-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposed-Memory Free Implementation for Cost-Effective 2D-DCT Processor

Abstract: This paper presents a cost-effective 2D-DCT processor based on a fast row/column decomposition approach. With a particular schedule, the processor does not require the transposed memory for 2D-DCT computing. We re-arrange the cosine coefficients of the first and second 1D-DCT transformations to keep DC-coefficient error free. The new architecture uses state-machines to generate cosine coefficients rather than ROM table, to save the memory cells and the address generator. For 8×8 DCT realization, the circuit on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By doing so, the 8-point 2-D DCT is decomposed into two 4x4 matrices which are multiplied by 4x1 vectors in a pipelined manner. Hsia [18] eliminated the use of transpose buffer by adopting a particular Since the IEEE-1180 conformance test is mainly intended for the IDCT computation, we also used the popular objective quality metric called Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) to test and compare the FDCT quality of three different algorithms: LibJPEG LLM-based implementation, original Massimino's algorithm, and our modified version of Massimino's algorithm. The PSNR flowchart is shown in Figure 9, and works as follows.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, the 8-point 2-D DCT is decomposed into two 4x4 matrices which are multiplied by 4x1 vectors in a pipelined manner. Hsia [18] eliminated the use of transpose buffer by adopting a particular Since the IEEE-1180 conformance test is mainly intended for the IDCT computation, we also used the popular objective quality metric called Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) to test and compare the FDCT quality of three different algorithms: LibJPEG LLM-based implementation, original Massimino's algorithm, and our modified version of Massimino's algorithm. The PSNR flowchart is shown in Figure 9, and works as follows.…”
Section: Review Of Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed a tremendous increase in throughput compared to previously published results. The proposed memory subsystem also allows a latency time of just 8 clock cycles for DCT and IDCT compared to 22 cycles in [3] and 10 cycles in [4] while supporting slightly higher operating frequencies as well. The ASIC implementation too will provide peak throughput almost twice that observed in the earlier implementation.…”
Section: Implementation Of Signal Processing Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%