1990
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.8.3248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposition rates of movable genetic elements in Drosophila melanogaster.

Abstract: A considerable proportion of visible mutations is reported to be caused by the insertion of mobile genetic elements in Drosophila and other organisms. We estimated transposition rates of some Drosophia mobile elements by using the lines AW and JH in which spontaneous mutations have been accumulated independently for about 400 generations. Occupied sites of the mobile elements were detected by in situ hybridization on the salivary gland chromosomes sampled from 40 AW and 30 JH lines. The rates of insertion and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The heterogeneity of the estimates, at least partially, stems from the activity levels of TEs. Chromosomal aberrations and mobilization of TEs occurred at high frequencies in the MA lines in Mukai and Cockerham (1977) and Voelker et al (1980) (Yamaguchi and Mukai 1974;Harada et al 1990). Indeed, insertional mutations were identified as a major class of mutations in Harada et al (1993)'s MA experiment (Yamaguchi et al 1994; 5 of the 6 mutations analyzed) and the singlegeneration specific locus test by Yang et al (2001; 5 of the 13 mutations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The heterogeneity of the estimates, at least partially, stems from the activity levels of TEs. Chromosomal aberrations and mobilization of TEs occurred at high frequencies in the MA lines in Mukai and Cockerham (1977) and Voelker et al (1980) (Yamaguchi and Mukai 1974;Harada et al 1990). Indeed, insertional mutations were identified as a major class of mutations in Harada et al (1993)'s MA experiment (Yamaguchi et al 1994; 5 of the 6 mutations analyzed) and the singlegeneration specific locus test by Yang et al (2001; 5 of the 13 mutations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For instance, direct estimates of transposition in Drosophila, based on in situ hybridization studies in inbred lines, are of the magnitude 10 À3 -10 À4 insertions/element/generation, and in yeast are of magnitude 10 À5 , although unlike the elements investigated here, these estimated rates are for retrotransposons (Harada et al 1990;Curcio and Garfinkel 1991;Nuzhdin and Mackay 1994). Transposition rates approaching or exceeding the magnitude observed in this study have, however, been reported in Drosophila crosses for P elements as well as retrotransposons (Berg and Spradling 1991;Labrador et al 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective population size of D. melanogaster has been estimated to be between 10 6 (Kreitman 1983) and 10 5 (Schug et al 1998). The retrotransposition/transposition rates of TEs vary greatly across families in D. melanogaster, ranging from 0 to 3.94 3 10 À3 per element per generation (Ising and Block 1981;Biemont and Aouar 1987;Biemont et al 1990;Harada et al 1990;Nuzhdin andMackay 1994, 1995;Suh et al 1995;Maside et al 2000Maside et al , 2001. (Rates estimated from previous studies are summarized in Supplemental Table S1.)…”
Section: Forward Simulations Of the Population Genetics Of Pirts And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rates estimated from previous studies are summarized in Supplemental Table S1.) The retrotransposition/transposition rate estimates for individual TE families often differ among studies, but the genomic average retrotransposition/transposition rate is usually within the range of 1.15 3 10 À4 to 3.5 3 10 À4 per element per generation (summarized in Supplemental Table S2), with the excision rate one or two orders of magnitude lower (Eggleston et al 1988;Harada et al 1990;Nuzhdin and Mackay 1995;Nuzhdin et al 1997;Maside et al 2000). In natural populations of D. melanogaster, the selective intensity against a segregating TE has been estimated to be on the order of 10 À5 -10 À4 per element, thus in the quadratic function of fitness, a is usually set at 10 À5 and b is in the range of 10 À6 -10 À5 (Charlesworth et al 1994;Charlesworth 2006, 2008).…”
Section: Forward Simulations Of the Population Genetics Of Pirts And mentioning
confidence: 99%