2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposon debris in ciliate genomes

Abstract: The germline genomes of ciliated protists are replete with “junk” DNA insertions that need to be removed for gene expression. Unlike introns, these are spliced as DNA. What is their source, and why are they so abundant? A new study in PLOS Biology supports a classic model of transposon origins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also suggests that TBE1 and TBE2 expanded in Oxytricha after its divergence from other hypotrichous ciliates. As illustrated in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 , the MIC genome contexts of TBEs in Oxytricha and Tetmemena are similar, with many TE insertions within IESs, consistent with either IESs as hotspots for TE insertion or with the model ( Klobutcher and Herrick, 1997 ) that some TE insertions may have generated IESs, as demonstrated in Paramecium ( Sellis et al, 2021 ; Feng and Landweber, 2021 ). Subsequent sequence evolution at the edges of IES/MDS pointers ( DuBois and Prescott, 1995 ) can give rise to boundaries that no longer correspond precisely to TBE ends.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This also suggests that TBE1 and TBE2 expanded in Oxytricha after its divergence from other hypotrichous ciliates. As illustrated in Figure 2—figure supplement 1 , the MIC genome contexts of TBEs in Oxytricha and Tetmemena are similar, with many TE insertions within IESs, consistent with either IESs as hotspots for TE insertion or with the model ( Klobutcher and Herrick, 1997 ) that some TE insertions may have generated IESs, as demonstrated in Paramecium ( Sellis et al, 2021 ; Feng and Landweber, 2021 ). Subsequent sequence evolution at the edges of IES/MDS pointers ( DuBois and Prescott, 1995 ) can give rise to boundaries that no longer correspond precisely to TBE ends.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Transposon proliferation stops (“abdication”) when its transposase is domesticated by a host promoter, releasing the transposons from purifying selection, whereupon their sequences erode by drift (“fade”). Depictions of the IBAF model usually show all the transposons expressing transposases during “bloom”, i.e., functioning as autonomous transposons ( 4 , 54 ). This is reasonable for Tetrahymena and Oxytricha , which have hundreds of germline-encoded transposases that vastly outnumber those in the somatic genome ( SI Appendix , Table S4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This also suggests that TBE1 and TBE2 expanded in Oxytricha after its divergence from other hypotrichous ciliates. As illustrated in Figure S1, the MIC genome contexts of TBEs in Oxytricha and Tetmemena are similar, with many TE insertions within IESs, suggesting that some TE insertions may have generated IESs, as demonstrated in Paramecium (50,51). For further discussion of the conservation of TBE locations, see the section, "Oxytricha and Tetmemena share conserved rearrangement junctions'' below.…”
Section: Germline Genome Expansion Via Repetitive Elementsmentioning
confidence: 88%