“…Had we, as Charlesworth et al (2023) assume, mapped these genes to the P. reticulata genome or a P. picta genome that had been scaffolded with the P. reticulata genome ( Charlesworth, Graham, et al 2021 ; Künstner et al 2016 ), we might indeed expect the spurious inclusion of PAR genes in the nonrecombining region. However, our approach avoided this potential technical artifact by mapping the X–Y orthologs to our newly produced chromosome-level female P. picta reference genome that was de novo assembled from PacBio HiFi reads scaffolded with Hi-C data, thus ensuring we captured any inversions unique to P. picta ( Metzger et al 2022 ). We used this new P. picta reference genome for detailed synteny analysis with related species, including P. reticulata , to ensure an accurate PAR boundary.…”