2010
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.51.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transradial Approach Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in an Out-Patient Clinic Safety and Feasibility Trial of Same-Day Discharge Versus Hospital Admission

Abstract: SummarySame-day discharge transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TRI) has been reported to be safe and feasible in Western countries. However, Asia has not produced any reports related to this matter. The present study explored the safety and feasibility of patients with indications for TR coronary angiography and ad hoc PCI with a same-day discharge protocol. Between October 1995 and December 2002, 660 adult patients were admitted to our hospital for ad hoc PCIs. Of these, 214 patients were discharge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, the appropriateness of both TRI and SDD as candidate approaches to PCI care is self-evident. Both approaches are safe (as shown by several previous studies and meta-analyses), 33,72 ” 75 effective as demonstrated by the associated cost savings shown here; efficient (as demonstrated by studies on time demands of PCI options) 43,76 78 and patient-centered (since they both target patient satisfaction) 66 . In this context, it is encouraging to note that the use of TRI in the United States is rapidly increasing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this context, the appropriateness of both TRI and SDD as candidate approaches to PCI care is self-evident. Both approaches are safe (as shown by several previous studies and meta-analyses), 33,72 ” 75 effective as demonstrated by the associated cost savings shown here; efficient (as demonstrated by studies on time demands of PCI options) 43,76 78 and patient-centered (since they both target patient satisfaction) 66 . In this context, it is encouraging to note that the use of TRI in the United States is rapidly increasing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…For those who have experienced both TRA and transfemoral approach, there is a strong patient preference for TRA due to increased function and reduced discomfort (5,6,23). With data supporting its safety and efficacy, it is clear that TRA is an attractive option for same‐day/outpatient percutaneous coronary interventions (5,6,25).…”
Section: Advantages Of Tra Over Transfemoral Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad-hoc percutaneous coronary interventions, performed immediately after diagnostic angiography, have been shown to have equivalent short and long term safety when compared to elective interventions (101)(102)(103)(104)(105). In current clinical practice, ad-hoc PCI represents the majority of elective coronary interventions in most countries.…”
Section: Outpatient Strategy Is Feasible With Transradial Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%