“…Scardino [3] found that when TRUS indicated gland-confined disease, this was supported by morphological findings in only 76% of cases. In a similar comparative study in 1990, Hauzeur et al [9], summarising 4 investigations, including their own, found the sensitivity of TRUS in identifying extraprostat ic carcinoma to range from 57 to 86% and specificity from 78 to 100%. Subsequent publications have also empha sised understaging of prostatic carcinoma by ultrasound when compared with the histopathological findings in the radical prostatectomy specimens [10][11][12][13], The discrepan cy between TRUS and morphology seems even more seri ous when prostatic tumour is reported to be unconfined in 40-60% of cases in a number of radical prostatectomy series [14].…”