2008
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000333791.29091.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transsphenoidal Approaches for the Extracapsular Resection of Midline Suprasellar and Anterior Cranial Base Lesions

Abstract: Gross total extracapsular resection of midline suprasellar tumors via a transsphenoidal approach is possible but is associated with a higher risk of complications than is standard transsphenoidal surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] The surgical options for these tumors, thus, remain limited to either staged transsphenoidal resections after residual tumor descends into the sella, or transcranial removal, or combined/staged transsphenoidal-transcranial approaches. [27][28][29][30] The extended endonasal transsphenoidal approach has recently been used in the surgical treatment of a variety of midline skull base tumors, [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] including craniopharyngiomas, Rathke cleft cysts, and meningiomas. However, this approach is not commonly used for removal of pituitary adenomas and only a few reports are available in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[26] The surgical options for these tumors, thus, remain limited to either staged transsphenoidal resections after residual tumor descends into the sella, or transcranial removal, or combined/staged transsphenoidal-transcranial approaches. [27][28][29][30] The extended endonasal transsphenoidal approach has recently been used in the surgical treatment of a variety of midline skull base tumors, [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] including craniopharyngiomas, Rathke cleft cysts, and meningiomas. However, this approach is not commonly used for removal of pituitary adenomas and only a few reports are available in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach is not commonly used for removal of pituitary adenomas and only a few reports are available in the literature. [11,13,31,32] Recently, we employed the extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EEEA) as described above in detail, in a subgroup of patients who had pituitary macroadenomas with dumbbell (hour-glass) configuration, firm or fibrous consistency, complete suprasellar location, larger subfrontal extension, or recurrent tumors after previous surgery/radiation. The advantages of EEEA are many and are mainly because of the wider exposure that it provides after removal of SF and the bone of the TS and PS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique of extended transsphenoidal microsurgical approach, which involves removal of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale (PD), and first described by Weiss [27] in 1987, has the advantage of providing direct visualization and access to the lesions located in the suprasellar and supradiaphragmatic regions. [28][29][30][31][32] With advances in endoscopic technology, surgery for craniopharyngiomas has undergone a revolutionary transformation in the past few years. Increased experience in transnasal surgery has led to the introduction of the endoscopic approach in the surgical management of tumors at locations other than the sellar cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased experience in transnasal surgery has led to the introduction of the endoscopic approach in the surgical management of tumors at locations other than the sellar cavity. [15,[27][28][29][30][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] The pure extended (transtuberculum transplanum) endoscopic endonasal approach is a more recent modification in the endoscopic approaches and provides a direct midline exposure for access to the retrochiasmatic craniopharyngiomas. [31,36,[41][42][43][44] Recent literature suggests that for most craniopharyngiomas, the degree of resection via the endonasal endoscopic approach, in experienced hands, is comparable or superior to that obtained by the transcranial routes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%