1999
DOI: 10.1159/000019832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transurethral Needle Ablation (TUNA<sup>TM</sup>)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the TEMPRO system has several advantages. In addition, TUNA is not suitable for prostates larger than 75 ml (Chapple, Issa, & Woo, 1999). In addition, endoscopy is not needed prior to the TEMPRO thermoablation procedure unlike TUMT (D'Ancona et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the TEMPRO system has several advantages. In addition, TUNA is not suitable for prostates larger than 75 ml (Chapple, Issa, & Woo, 1999). In addition, endoscopy is not needed prior to the TEMPRO thermoablation procedure unlike TUMT (D'Ancona et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last decade, a number of less invasive treatment options for elderly men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been developed [1, 2, 3, 4]. One of the driving forces behind this development was the intra– and postoperative morbidity of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) [5, 6, 7, 8, 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients undergoing TUNA require no hospitalisation. Analysis of clinical outcome of TUNA in a number of non-randomised studies confirmed subjective and objective improvement observed in the RCT from Bruskewitz and co-workers [92]but an average failure rate of 20.1% (range: 5–42) was reported suggesting that clinical response might not be as durable as desired [93]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Results of several non-randomised studies confirmed the clinical benefit observed in the randomised study from Bruskewitz and co-workers [92]although a significant variability was observed. Failure rate in non-randomised studies is in the range of 20% [93]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%