2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.12.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trap effects on vacancy defect of C3N as anode material in Li-ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[20] Guo et al demonstratedt hat vacancy defect-containing C 3 N has higherL ib indinge nergy than the pristine form but needs to overcome ah igher barrierf or Li diffusion owing to the trap effect. [21] Nevertheless, our study reveals that vacancy defects in monolayer MnPS 3 significantly enhanceL ib inding and specific capacity of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[20] Guo et al demonstratedt hat vacancy defect-containing C 3 N has higherL ib indinge nergy than the pristine form but needs to overcome ah igher barrierf or Li diffusion owing to the trap effect. [21] Nevertheless, our study reveals that vacancy defects in monolayer MnPS 3 significantly enhanceL ib inding and specific capacity of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…[37] As reportede arlier,i ntroduction of singlea nd/or multiple vacancy defects may either act as ab oon or burden for LIB applications. [20,21,38] In contrast to graphene, here the introduction of vacancy defects substantially enhances the Li binding ability (binding energy increases from À2.03 to À2.32 eV) to the MnPS 3 surface ( Figure 6a,b). However,t here is slight decrease in Li adsorption energy when ad ual vacancy is introduced into the surface (À2.03 to À1.95 eV;F igure 6c,d and Figure S13 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The relationship between volumetric capacity and gravimetric capacity also suggests that tellurides may possess more competitive volumetric energy storage capability due to their higher relative molecular mass compared to that of sulfides and selenides, which means tellurides are more suitable for applications in the size matter situation. Moreover, tellurides usually have a small bandgap [12] . The bandgap of Sb 2 Te 3 , Bi 2 Te 3 , and SnTe are only 0.21 eV, 0.21 eV, and 0.18 eV, respectively, which are much smaller than its sulfides (Sb 2 S 3 : 1.55 eV, Bi 2 S 3 : 1.3–1.7 eV, SnS: 1.07 eV), demonstrating the more superior charge transfer kinetics of tellurides.…”
Section: Advantages Of Te and Tellurides In Energy Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society. Correlation between the energy barriers and diffusion path on C 3 N monolayer with the presence of (c) carbon and (d) nitrogen vacancies . Reproduced with permission from Ref.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Migration Of Lithium Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%