2022
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.777200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapezoid-Grid Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method for 3D Seismic Wavefield Modeling Using CPML Absorbing Boundary Condition

Abstract: The large computational memory requirement is an important issue in 3D large-scale wave modeling, especially for GPU calculation. Based on the observation that wave propagation velocity tends to gradually increase with depth, we propose a 3D trapezoid-grid finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method to achieve the reduction of memory usage without a significant increase of computational time or a decrease of modeling accuracy. It adopts the size-increasing trapezoid-grid mesh to fit the increasing trend of sei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite‐difference method (FDM), not only in the time domain (Alterman & Karal, 1968; Alford et al., 1974; Liu, 2013; Wu et al., 2022) but also in the frequency domain (Xu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2002), has been widely used to model various types of wave equations due to its simple numerical system. However, the FDM has limited accuracy at interfaces with a discontinuity in material properties, especially at the acoustic–elastic interface (De Basabe et al., 2016; Robertsson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite‐difference method (FDM), not only in the time domain (Alterman & Karal, 1968; Alford et al., 1974; Liu, 2013; Wu et al., 2022) but also in the frequency domain (Xu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2002), has been widely used to model various types of wave equations due to its simple numerical system. However, the FDM has limited accuracy at interfaces with a discontinuity in material properties, especially at the acoustic–elastic interface (De Basabe et al., 2016; Robertsson, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity-stress wave equation of 3D ERTM is solved using the staggered-grid finite-difference (SGFD) method (Virieux, 1986;Wu et al, 2022) in the time domain due to its high efficiency and easy implementation. However, the discretization of partial derivatives using the SGFD method causes truncation errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%