2019
DOI: 10.1111/soru.12249
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapped in the Past? The Reproduction of Poverty and Marginality in a Hungarian Manorial Village

Abstract: This article is an examination of the (re)‐production of poverty and marginality among former manorial servants and their descendants in a Hungarian manorial village. Manorial servants were a large subgroup of the agrarian proletariat in interwar Hungary; their long‐term, rural poverty – sometimes conceptualised as ‘traditional’ – has been aggravated by territorial stigmatisation and represents a specific case even within the context of rural poverty. However, the manorial settlement examined here (now the vil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar vein, Setten (2004) employs the concept of habitus and shows how the past is inscribed in the landscape both practically and morally, thus becoming part of the land management rules in the habitus of a specific group of Norwegians. Németh (2019) also focuses on a specific habitus and its transfer through generations in a small Hungarian village and she relates it with poverty and marginality. Although with a non‐Bourdieusian theoretical background, Wheeler (2014) also explores how remnants of mining activity in a British village constitute social memory and place identity within the community with the help of everyday experiences of landscape.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Habitus Social Memory and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar vein, Setten (2004) employs the concept of habitus and shows how the past is inscribed in the landscape both practically and morally, thus becoming part of the land management rules in the habitus of a specific group of Norwegians. Németh (2019) also focuses on a specific habitus and its transfer through generations in a small Hungarian village and she relates it with poverty and marginality. Although with a non‐Bourdieusian theoretical background, Wheeler (2014) also explores how remnants of mining activity in a British village constitute social memory and place identity within the community with the help of everyday experiences of landscape.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Habitus Social Memory and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They belonged to the neighbouring village or town de jure, but in most cases they were detached from the municipality centre physically and usually the role of public administration bodies was minor in influencing local evolutionary processes and path creation. At these localities, the owners and the stewards (farm managers) were the most important actors (Gyáni et al 2004;Féja 1938;Illyés 1993;Mikle 2018;Németh 2019). Stewards organised the everyday work in manorial settlements, they were responsible for making the production as efficient as possible, and they had to be aware of all the production stages.…”
Section: Rural Evolution Influenced By Large-scale Farmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agriculture, these reforms were set in the first half of the 1960s. On the one hand, the former strict central control of state farms was replaced by freedom in terms of strategic decisions, while on the other hand, agricultural expertise became more important than political trustworthiness when it came to the nomination of farm leaders (Izinger 1983;Varga 2010). As a result, state farms initiated experiments on making the production more oriented towards the global markets (Varga 2014).…”
Section: Rural Evolution Influenced By Large-scale Farmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common feature of such isolated housing estates is, inter alia, a high percentage of unemployment, a low level of education, a high intensity of excluded individuals, a low level of living and sanitary conditions, poor infrastructure, high indicators of deviant behaviours (e.g., alcohol abuse or violence), as well as lowered aspirations and motivation to work [8]. Another problem is the insufficient mobility of their inhabitants, which makes it difficult or even impossible to get out of the enclave [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%