1979
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(79)90158-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping of deuterium implanted in carbon and silicon: A calibration for particle-energy measurements in the plasma boundary of tokamaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). No saturation was reached as had been previously observed in pyrolytic graphite [2]. An increase of the irradiation temperature leads to the decrease of the D concentration both in the near-surface layers and in the bulk of the CFC NB31 (Fig.…”
Section: Deuterium Retentionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). No saturation was reached as had been previously observed in pyrolytic graphite [2]. An increase of the irradiation temperature leads to the decrease of the D concentration both in the near-surface layers and in the bulk of the CFC NB31 (Fig.…”
Section: Deuterium Retentionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In dense pyrolytic graphite the retention of implanted hydrogen isotopes saturates when the concentration in the implantation range reaches about 30 at% [ 2 ]. In fine grain graphites with a typical density around 1,85 g/cm 3 a slow increase in retention with ion fluence was found [ 3 , 4 ].In doped CFC materials, a steeper increase in retention and diffusion far beyond the ion range was observed [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of 200 eV D ion irradiation at room temperature, the retention increase proceeds proportional to Φ 0.5 at high ion fluences. No saturation was reached as observed in pyrolytic graphite [20]. The relatively low D retention in the CFC N11 exposed to the PISCES-A plasma at 473 K, as compared to the CFC NB31 irradiated with D ions, can only partly be explained by the lower ion energies.…”
Section: Inventories and Depth Profilesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A fraction of the incident ions can be neutralized at the entrance apertures, resulting in 1.5-3% fraction of high-energy neutrals in the decelerated beam [6,7]. This leads to a 10% uncertainty of the low-energy particles fluence [8]. Ion implantations were always performed at normal incidence and room temperature.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%