2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2006
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2006.356125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trapping of Electrons and Holes in p-type Silicon Irradiated with Neutrons

Abstract: Trapping times of drifting electrons and holes were measured in high resistivity standard, oxygenated and magnetic Czochralski p-type materials with charge correction method. Diodes were irradiated with neutrons up to equivalent fluence Φ eq =3x10 14 cm -2 . Trapping times were parameterized as 1/τ=βΦ. Average β was measured to be β e =4.2x10 -16 cm 2 ns -1 for electrons and β h = 4.3x10 -16 cm 2 ns -1 for holes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early estimations of the trapping parameter c, the constant for neutron damaged n-type pad detectors, in Eq. (5) gave c 1 ¼ 5.1 Â 10 À16 cm 2 /ns, using the transient current technique (TCT) [23]. The dotted line in Fig.…”
Section: Collected Chargementioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early estimations of the trapping parameter c, the constant for neutron damaged n-type pad detectors, in Eq. (5) gave c 1 ¼ 5.1 Â 10 À16 cm 2 /ns, using the transient current technique (TCT) [23]. The dotted line in Fig.…”
Section: Collected Chargementioning
confidence: 93%
“…[23]. Since in n-on-p type detectors the signal is mostly due to electron transport, we concentrate here on electron trapping only, and simulate the collected signal simply with a step-wise transport of electrons in a field of a p-type microstrip detector.…”
Section: Collected Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…n/cm 2 for different bias voltages (note that the lateral depletion voltage is 400 V). Radiation damage is included in the simulations by using the effective doping concentration, (i.e., 2 × 10 14 cm −3 , calculated assuming an acceptor introduction rate of 2×10 −2 cm −1 [18]), and by accounting for carrier trapping with the trapping times reported in [18]. Current signals (see Fig.…”
Section: Development Of 3d Detectors At Fbk-irstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is used in the simulations, assuming the acceptor introduction rate to be 2×10 −2 cm −1 [11]. Moreover, a post-processing of the simulated current signals is performed to account for carrier trapping, relying on the trapping times reported in [11].…”
Section: Device Description and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a post-processing of the simulated current signals is performed to account for carrier trapping, relying on the trapping times reported in [11]. As can be seen in Fig.…”
Section: Device Description and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%