2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing a higher WTP threshold ($29 300/QALY) would have resulted in durvalumab plus GemCis being the most cost‐effective strategy in the United States. The GDP per capita in China also varies markedly among different regions, with respective WTP thresholds in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Xizang, Heilongjiang and Gansu of $82 974, $78 308, $44 434, $40 232, $32 081, $29 588, $25 434, $22 210 and $19 636 per QALY in 2022 36 . Strikingly, while durvalumab plus GemCis is likely to be the most cost‐effective treatment option in the majority of the regions of China (27/34), pembrolizumab plus GemCis may be the best therapeutic option in less developed regions (7/34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing a higher WTP threshold ($29 300/QALY) would have resulted in durvalumab plus GemCis being the most cost‐effective strategy in the United States. The GDP per capita in China also varies markedly among different regions, with respective WTP thresholds in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangdong, Hubei, Hunan, Sichuan, Xizang, Heilongjiang and Gansu of $82 974, $78 308, $44 434, $40 232, $32 081, $29 588, $25 434, $22 210 and $19 636 per QALY in 2022 36 . Strikingly, while durvalumab plus GemCis is likely to be the most cost‐effective treatment option in the majority of the regions of China (27/34), pembrolizumab plus GemCis may be the best therapeutic option in less developed regions (7/34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, none of the ADCs approved for solid tumors can be considered cost-effective. However, cost effectiveness is highly dependent on the local markets and may vary from country to country [ 8 , 102 , 103 ].…”
Section: Mirvetuximab Soravtansine (Elahere™)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to solid tumors, in 2013, the FDA approved ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) (payload is a microtubule inhibitor) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer on the basis of its HER-2 targeting [ 4 ]. Another first-in-class ADC, trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dx) (payload is a topoisomerase I inhibitor), was first approved in 2021; currently, it is approved for HER2-positive breast cancer and, more recently, HER2-low (immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+) breast cancer, HER2 positive gastric or gastroesophageal cancer, and HER2 -mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4 Antibody–drug conjugates, such as ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) are also efficacious against BMs. 5 , 6 Despite advancements in the treatment of HER2+ BCBM with both TKIs and antibody–drug conjugates, the prognosis for these patients remains unfavorable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%