Background: The occurrence of the pharyngoesophageal, or Zenker diverticulum is not frequent
in the national scenario, and the technique of the diverticulectomy with
cricomyotomy in medium and great dimension diverticula is still the most
indicated. Because the resection of the diverticulum requires the suture of the
pharynx, dehiscence can occur, thereafter delaying swallowing. Hence, the idea is
to accomplish this surgical procedure, comparing the manual and mechanical suture,
in order to evaluate the real benefit of the mechanical technique. Aim: To evaluate the results of the pharyngoesophageal diverticulectomy with
cricomyotomy using manual and mechanical suture with regard to local and systemic
complications. Method: Fifty-seven patients with pharyngoesophageal diverticula diagnosed through high
digestive endoscopy and pharyngeal esophagogram were studied. The applied surgical
technique was diverticulectomy with myotomy of the cricopharyngeal muscle, done in
24 patients (42.2%) the mechanical suture (group A) with the mechanical linear
suture device and in 33 (57.8%) a manual closure of the pharynx (group B). Results: In the postoperative period, one patient of group A (4.1%) presented fistula
caused by dehiscence of the pharyngeal suture, and three of group B (15.1%)
presented the same complication, with a good outcome using a conservative
treatment. In the same group, three patients (9.0%) presented stenosis of the
suture of the pharynx, with good outcome and with endoscopic dilatations, and no
patient from group A presented such complication. Lung infection was present in
five patients, being two (8.3%) of group A and three (9.0%) on B, having good
outcomes after specific treatment. In the late review, done with 43 patients
(94.4%) of group A and 22 (88.0%) on B, the patients declared to be pleased with
the surgical procedure, because they were able to regain normal swallowing. Conclusion: The diverticulectomy with myotomy and pharyngeal closure using mechanical suture
was proven appropriate, for having restored regular swallowing in most of the
patients, and the mechanical closure of the pharynx proved to be more effective in
comparison to the manual one, because it provided a lower index of local
post-surgical complications.