2008
DOI: 10.4321/s0004-06142008000200028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tratamiento endoscópico en reflujo vesicoureteral (RVU): Comparación de diferentes sustancias. Resultados a largo plazo

Abstract: Endoscopic treatment is a useful tool in the long-term management of VUR, both as definitive treatment or as on alternative to conventional medical management, with better results when using Macroplastique and Deflux.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is little evidence of major differences in VUR resolution rates between injectable agents in current use (34). This appears contingent upon formation of a longlasting bolus following injection; experience with bovine collagen indicated lower efficacy than with other injectable agents (111)(112)(113). This was attributable to degradation of collagen post-injection, and collagen is not currently used for endoscopic treatment of VUR.…”
Section: Endoscopic Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little evidence of major differences in VUR resolution rates between injectable agents in current use (34). This appears contingent upon formation of a longlasting bolus following injection; experience with bovine collagen indicated lower efficacy than with other injectable agents (111)(112)(113). This was attributable to degradation of collagen post-injection, and collagen is not currently used for endoscopic treatment of VUR.…”
Section: Endoscopic Injectionmentioning
confidence: 99%