“…In addition to a general consensus surrounding the definition of trauma bonding, Casassa et al (2021) also identified four key aspects of trauma bonding that emerged from the literature: (1) a strong association between susceptibility to trauma bonding and prior abusive and exploitative experiences, specifically in childhood; (2) survivors' conviction of their love for their trafficker, which often persists even after exiting their trafficking situation; (3) feelings of affection motivate survivors to protect traffickers from legal consequences; and (4) traffickers' intentional exploitation of emotional vulnerabilities and basic attachment needs (i.e., love, safety, affection) in order to develop a traumatic bond. The paradoxical nature of trauma bonds has significant implications for survivors of sex trafficking (Casassa et al, 2021): (1) attachment to the perpetrator prevents survivors from leaving abusive situations (Baldwin et al, 2015;Reid et al, 2013); (2) attachments motivate survivors to protect perpetrators from legal consequences (Clawson et al, 2008;Nichols, 2016); and (3) survivors grow distrustful of outside or institutional systems that can offer help or protection (i.e., social services and police) as they internalize the perpetrator's perceptions of such systems as well as a sense of guilt (Sanchez et al, 2019), making survivors unlikely to utilize such services even when presented with the opportunity to do so. Thus, the development of trauma bonds themselves perpetuates physical, emotional, and mental exploitation.…”