2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7944(00)00432-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trauma experience comparison of army forward surgical team surgeons at Ben Taub Hospital and Madigan Army Medical Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The US Army have listed 57 surgical procedures among 350 injuries, which are classified by different regions such as head and neck, upper and lower extremity, chest, abdomen/pelvis, and burns [8][9][10]. In Chinese Army, 22 surgeries are listed in FST operation procedure and divided into two levels: emergency life-saving surgery and damage control surgery (Fig.…”
Section: Study Of Advanced Surgical Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The US Army have listed 57 surgical procedures among 350 injuries, which are classified by different regions such as head and neck, upper and lower extremity, chest, abdomen/pelvis, and burns [8][9][10]. In Chinese Army, 22 surgeries are listed in FST operation procedure and divided into two levels: emergency life-saving surgery and damage control surgery (Fig.…”
Section: Study Of Advanced Surgical Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous military surgeons had concerns about the JTTC program due to credentialing issues and maintenance of clinical proficiency. 107 Also, the JTTC prohibited participants from using their assigned medical equipment or practicing as teams due to legal issues. The JTTC ceased operations in 2001, so three military services established separate training programs.…”
Section: Certification Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%