Compassion fatigue (CF) has been a well-documented occupational hazard for clinicians over the past few decades. However, there are several limitations with the current conceptualizations describing the impact of indirect trauma. First, there is a lack of consistency in terms related to CF. Second, there is limited attention in the current models to clinicians' relational triggers as a key factor impacting their emotional responses to clients. The current article proposes a new term, absorption vulnerability (AV), to capture the risk level and root causes of developing distress and impairment due to trauma work. This new AV model integrates secondary trauma exposure and relational triggers of personal trauma history, family of origin and attachment issues, and the degree of differentiation of self. Interventions to metabolize absorbed trauma and reduce future risk of AV are explored.