2016
DOI: 10.7205/milmed-d-14-00486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trauma Resuscitation Evaluation Times and Correlating Human Patient Simulation Training Differences—What is the Standard?

Abstract: TR mean times were similar to the HPS arm subsets demonstrating simulation as an effective educational tool. Effective stepwise approaches, incremental time goals, and superior HPS training can improve patient survivability and improved departmental productivity using TR teams.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 19 ] The concept that SBME correctly simulates live patients and the skills learner is therefore translatable was recently supported by work from the US military. [ 20 ] In work similar to ours, trauma evaluations were shown to be accomplished more rapidly and with fewer errors after completion of a mass casualty simulation curriculum. [ 21 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[ 19 ] The concept that SBME correctly simulates live patients and the skills learner is therefore translatable was recently supported by work from the US military. [ 20 ] In work similar to ours, trauma evaluations were shown to be accomplished more rapidly and with fewer errors after completion of a mass casualty simulation curriculum. [ 21 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Along with habituation to stress, team performance was documented by specific metric improvements. Resuscitation time decreased by 10 minutes to an average of 13.91 minutes—approaching the mean evaluation time of 10.33 minutes for a highly experienced trauma team in a level 1 DoD facility 14. This is a significant clinical finding as rapid, effective trauma resuscitations decrease patient morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Similar to prior years, the most common study populations were medical students (21/75; 28%) and residents (48/75; 64%) . Interestingly, this year only one study addressing medical students was highlighted for excellence, in contrast to prior years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Three of these studies with an experimental design were highlighted . There was a decline in the number of observational studies (35/75; 47%), compared to 2015 (36/61; 59%), but an increase in the number of studies using survey methodology (19/75; 25%) in 2016 compared to 10 of 61, 16% in 2015, and 0% in 2014. It should be noted that all survey studies in this review drew data from participants from multiple institutions per the predetermined selection criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation