Trauma teams and time to early management during in situ trauma team training

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate the association between the time taken to make a decision to go to surgery and gender, ethnicity, years in profession, experience of trauma team training, experience of structured trauma courses and trauma in the trauma team, as well as use of closed-loop communication and leadership styles during trauma team training.DesignIn situ trauma team training. The patient simulator was preprogrammed to represent a severely injured patient (injury severity score: 25) suffering from hypovolemia due to external trauma.SettingAn emergency room in an urban Scandinavian level one trauma centre.ParticipantsA total of 96 participants were divided into 16 trauma teams. Each team consisted of six team members: one surgeon/emergency physician (designated team leader), one anaesthesiologist, one registered nurse anaesthetist, one registered nurse from the emergency department, one enrolled nurse from the emergency department and one enrolled nurse from the operating theatre.Primary outcomeHRs with CIs (95% CI) for the time taken to make a decision to go to surgery was computed from a Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsThree variables remained significant in the final model. Closed-loop communication initiated by the team leader increased the chance of a decision to go to surgery (HR: 3.88; CI 1.02 to 14.69). Only 8 of the 16 teams made the decision to go to surgery within the timeframe of the trauma team training. Conversely, call-outs and closed-loop communication initiated by the team members significantly decreased the chance of a decision to go to surgery, (HR: 0.82; CI 0.71 to 0.96, and HR: 0.23; CI 0.08 to 0.71, respectively).ConclusionsClosed-loop communication initiated by the leader appears to be beneficial for teamwork. In contrast, a high number of call-outs and closed-loop communication initiated by team members might lead to a communication overload.

Comparison of trauma care systems in Asian countries: A systematic literature review

“…Hospital trauma care systems varied across the participating countries. The hospital trauma team, trauma protocol and education are the key elements of high‐quality trauma care . HICs have specialised trauma teams and trauma surgeons, while LMICs do not .…”

An observational study of self-monitoring in ad hoc health care teams

“…Every physician team leader carries the responsibility for their team's teamwork, because arguably a key purpose of instituting a physician team leader is to ensure good teamwork in ad-hoc teams. Given the complexity of leadership [3,10,12,13,49], particularly in highly dynamic environments such as emergency rooms, leaders may be operating at their full capacity and lack the necessary mental resources for additional meta-cognitive tasks such as selfmonitoring. The diffusion of responsibility observable even in small groups [50,51] may also lead to this diffused responsibility being burdened on the team leader when teams institute such a function explicitly, resulting in further leader overload.…”

Team talk and team activity in simulated medical emergencies: a discourse analytical approach

“…Despite the extensive focus on the relationship between closed loop communication and patient safety in medicine, Härgestam (2013) found that closed loop communication was rarely used during trauma team training, even in high performing teams [17]. In addition, closed loop communication initiated by a team member rather than by the team leader could lead to communication overload [47]. Online commentaries are closely related to utterances that are termed “information-related talking to the room”, which refers to interpreting and sharing information that is associated with the further use of information-related talking to the room in high-performing anaesthesia teams [48].…”